<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surface Surface  MyMac Podcast #408</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymac.com/2012/06/surface-surface-mymac-podcast-408/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymac.com/2012/06/surface-surface-mymac-podcast-408/</link>
	<description>Publishing since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bdegrande</title>
		<link>http://www.mymac.com/2012/06/surface-surface-mymac-podcast-408/comment-page-1/#comment-32433</link>
		<dc:creator>bdegrande</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 05:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymac.com/?p=14846#comment-32433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have maybe a rather unusual opinion on Surface.  First off,calling both tablets Windows 8 does not in any way, shape, or form mean that they are running the same OS. Windows RT isn&#039;t Windows any more than Windows CE was.  Linux/Android and OS X/iOS share a lot of code, it does not make them the same OS as they don&#039;t run the same software.

The big mistake Microsoft made with Win 8 is that they caused their users the pain of changing the user interface without streamlining what is underneath - Win 8 still has a registry and the associated bloat. Microsoft really needs to do what Apple did with OS X - blow it up and start over with a small, fast core - Win 9, maybe?

RT tablets hace a chance to do well.  A &quot;Micosoft equivalent of the iPad&quot; but with the ability to run Office could have a lot of buyers IF Microsoft has the patience to persuade developers to write for RT.

Full Win 8 tablets will flop totally (and I have owned a Win XP tablet).  A full multuser, multitasking OS will NOT run well on the limited hardware of a tablet, any more than Windows 7 or Vista ran well on netbooks.  The heat and battery issues will be very real, and the OS itself will take up a lot of disk space.

The few specs we have seen confirm this.  64GB is the smallest Pro model Microsoft will offer and the 2 lb. weight is presumably a very large battery (without a retina display to justify it), and the Core i5 processor it requires is going to cause heat issues. A first generation iPad, with 256MB of memory and a slow processor, runs quickly because the OS doesn&#039;t make heavy demands on it. Just the opposite is true of Win 8. A 64GB Surface Pro is not going to be remotely as good a user experience as a 64GB iPad - not in speed, weight, or ease of use.  These tablets are not going to sell even to enterprise when employees know that iPads exist, and I think this is true regardless of how well Windows 8 does in general.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have maybe a rather unusual opinion on Surface.  First off,calling both tablets Windows 8 does not in any way, shape, or form mean that they are running the same OS. Windows RT isn&#8217;t Windows any more than Windows CE was.  Linux/Android and OS X/iOS share a lot of code, it does not make them the same OS as they don&#8217;t run the same software.</p>
<p>The big mistake Microsoft made with Win 8 is that they caused their users the pain of changing the user interface without streamlining what is underneath &#8211; Win 8 still has a registry and the associated bloat. Microsoft really needs to do what Apple did with OS X &#8211; blow it up and start over with a small, fast core &#8211; Win 9, maybe?</p>
<p>RT tablets hace a chance to do well.  A &#8220;Micosoft equivalent of the iPad&#8221; but with the ability to run Office could have a lot of buyers IF Microsoft has the patience to persuade developers to write for RT.</p>
<p>Full Win 8 tablets will flop totally (and I have owned a Win XP tablet).  A full multuser, multitasking OS will NOT run well on the limited hardware of a tablet, any more than Windows 7 or Vista ran well on netbooks.  The heat and battery issues will be very real, and the OS itself will take up a lot of disk space.</p>
<p>The few specs we have seen confirm this.  64GB is the smallest Pro model Microsoft will offer and the 2 lb. weight is presumably a very large battery (without a retina display to justify it), and the Core i5 processor it requires is going to cause heat issues. A first generation iPad, with 256MB of memory and a slow processor, runs quickly because the OS doesn&#8217;t make heavy demands on it. Just the opposite is true of Win 8. A 64GB Surface Pro is not going to be remotely as good a user experience as a 64GB iPad &#8211; not in speed, weight, or ease of use.  These tablets are not going to sell even to enterprise when employees know that iPads exist, and I think this is true regardless of how well Windows 8 does in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
