Comments on: MiCorder Digital MP3 RecorderReview

By: John Nemerovski

John Nemerovski — Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:41:21 +0000

“you can’t separate tracks recorded from a phonograph record”

This is correct, RB, but there are many payware, shareware, and possibly freeware software solutions for track separation. Let me know if you are unable to locate one you like. Thanks for your astute comment.

[Nemo]

By: RB

RB — Sat, 22 Jan 2011 20:16:32 +0000

I’ve looked at many sites reviewing this gadget and not one of them mentions that apparently you can’t separate tracks recorded from a phonograph record. It seems to me, unless there is a function somewhere I haven’t seen, that you would have to do totally separate recordings for each and every track on the record in order to get them separated in iTunes.
I was hoping to get this confirmed or denied but no one mentions this important factor.

By: Scott Willsey

Scott Willsey — Sat, 08 Jan 2011 11:51:50 +0000

Looks pretty cool, John. Can’t really justify purchasing one as I have plenty of other ways to record things, but it would definitely fill a niche, IMO.

By: John Nemerovski

John Nemerovski — Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:05:49 +0000

Question from David Cohen:

“One thing your review didn’t mention – what is the recording of live audio using the built-in microphone like? How does it compare to other devices (like the iPhone or an Ediirol)?”

Answer from Nemo:

In typical non-professional live audio situations, such as conversation or music, MiCorder has similar performance to an iPhone. Without advanced recording settings, when the original sound source is clear, MiCorder’s MP3 will be good. I continue to test MiCorder in different situations, and I am satisfied with its price-performance quality.