Why iPhoto Matters – A Lot.

On January 31, 2002, in Uncategorized, by David K Schultz

iPhoto has turned our Macworld upside-down.
It is, in an interesting way, very different from from
iMovie and iTunes, though each is equally a spoke in
our digital hubs. I
have written
about the human context which makes
iPhoto a slick reminder of our own, and of other’s,
mortality. But it is different in another way as well.

Again with the ‘Digital Hub’?

To see this, let’s remind ourselves
of the digital hub strategy Apple is pursuing. The
raise of gadgets, such as video cams, digicams, MP3
players, PDAs, and the like, is producing a larger
amount of different kinds of information for us to
deal with. Some, like Dell, have said that gadgets
foreshadow the end of the PC, since our technology,
in the form of gadgets, is portable, almost tearing
us away from our desktops and the boxes that sit on
them.

Steve Jobs, on the hand, and as I have
written here, sees gadgets not as a signal of the
end of the box PC, but as a transformative force which
is causing us to rethink the role a desktop plays
in our lives. With all the cameras, MP3s, video cameras,
and so on, we actually are accumulating more information
that we have to organize, archive, work with, play
with, and attempt to make as permanent as we can.
Since the gadgets that lead us away from our desktops
into the world of nieces’ birthday parties, scenic
drives, adventures and misadventures of various sorts,
produce varying kinds and more amounts of information
(photos, videos, music) than they can handle, they
necessarily drive us back to our desktop machine where
we can perform our organizing, archiving, and editing
tasks. Thus the digital
hub
is born.

iMovie & iDVD

When
iMovie
came out Apple assumed that, given the demographics
of the general population, which is growing older and
having families, that population has digital film which
has to be organized, archived and edited. While DV camcorders
have been hot items and many have them, when iMovie
came out there was no, as far as I can tell, mad rush
to buy DV camcorders to connect to our iMac DVs. Why?

It’s simple: They cost a lot of money
and require greater effort on our part to organize,
archive and edit than other digital media. DVD media
costs more, an Apple’s proprietary SuperDrive didn’t
help. Video information comes in gigabytes, not only
megabytes, and we have issues of storage to deal with.
But once we have the storage in place we have to transfer
the gigabytes of information to the storage/editing
device. USB is not the optimal choice, obviously.
No, Firewire, developed by Apple, is the choice of
means of transfer. However, when you add up storage
(larger hard drives, some external, all Firewire),
and add Firewire to a DV camcorder, you are not talking
about chump change for most of working stiffs. The
DV, Firewire camcorder by itself can easily cost over
a thousand dollars, and that doesn’t calculate in
the cost of larger hard drives or iMacs and iBooks.
It’s just plain expensive, and the editing and archiving
tasks are much less simple than they arewith MP3s,
for example.

When we turn to iDVD
the picture is not better. DVD-RAM drives can cost $800,
and
DVD media is much more expensive than generic CD-Rs.
If we add the cost of a DVD player (a cost which is
decreasing as you read this article), you again see
that iDVD, at this time, is something that is in many
a Mac user’s future, but not present. (An exception
to this rule, if it can be called that, is education,
which has committee and grant money to spend.)

I quickly add that Apple is helping
out in the DVD area with the software DVD player,
which in OS X is seamless and plays beautifully. And,
until January 7th, SuperDrive Macs that could burn
DVDs were out of most customers’ price-range; the
new iMac may change that with its $1800 price tag,
however. Thanks Apple.

So Apple’s assumption that most families
have DV camcorders, and players, and so need iMovie
or iDVD, may have been, well, not false, but perhaps
slightly exaggerated. However, Mac loyalists are happy
spending more money (not necessarily because Macs
cost more, but simply because they have severe cases
of applelust which must be satisfied), and they are
willing to pay more if it feeds the monkey.
The beauty, utility, and even symbolism, of owning
a Mac, is worth any extra costs a short upgrade cycle
brings. Or so some think…. Anyway, the point is
that more effort, and more cost go into putting us
in a position where iDVD and iMovie are actually useful
for many of us.

iTunes & iPod

iTunes
is the same way, but in a different way. When iTunes
came out we did not see masses rushing out to buy MP3
players. True, Apple had promos where one could pick
up a Rio when buying an iMac, so that was taken care
of. But in truth, because of the cheaper cost, and because,
as Steve Jobs says, “music is in our genes” (I think
that is the quote), we had already gravitated to MP3
players, or at least to a once thriving Napster, or
now Gnutella server, to grab some tunes, as well as
rip music from our pre-existing CD library (another
low cost life accessory). The fact that we could collect
‘free’ music meant that we could create large libraries
of music. CD-R drives were dropping in price, and the
media itself, the CDs, dropped to roughly 50 cents a
pop. We had a lot of digital audio information.

So with iTunes, the need was there
because the care and feeding of our lyrical spirit
was already expressing itself, given the relatively
low cost of archiving, and the easy access to large
libraries of digitized audio. Things were in place.

The iPod
then came along. Selling well, we guess. But if what
I just said
is true, then many do not need it. But that is
perfectly fine for a Mac user. Need is not always the
issue, and neither is the means nor the ability required
to cause us to buy. No: Pure desire, applelust, is sufficient
for us to reach for our plastic money. Many Mac users
told me (or I simply observed it), “I need an iPod,
I have a Rio, or I am not very musically mobile, but
man I want one!” Some iPods became upgrades, basically,
upgrading from our Rio or other antecedently acquired
MP3 players; or maybe an upgrade to a new lifestyle
of plugging our ears to hear the sounds of music.

Basically, Apple’s idea of a ‘digital
hub’ and some of the software and hardware they offer,
have turned one-time non-gadgeteers into, belt-clipping,
pocket buzzing, ear drum blasting, video intruding,
coolness factor loving, gadgeteers (even if the money
isn’t there).

I will not, at this point, investigate
that digital gadgets, from Palms to iPods, have a
way of becoming iShackles rather than giving us iFreedom.
But you know that…

iPhoto and Digital Cameras

And now we have iPhoto. We do not,
at this point, have iDigicam or iSnap, or iShoot,
or whatever one’s fancy causes him to name a mythical
Apple digital camera. (And no one knows, or can even
suggest without being laughed at, that Apple is working
on one. I doubt it. Why would they?) But iPhoto is
much different from the other programs Apple has released,
and we are seeing it have a major effect on the Apple
Community. Why it is having this effect and what it
is I will explain now.

The iPhoto Effect: Red Eye and Red Shifts

Interestingly enough, with iPhoto
and the digital hub, Apple’s place in the market
has been flipped on its head. Steve has bequeathed
to us “the digital hub.” Now we want the spokes.
What good is a hub without spokes? What good are
spokes without a hub? Ever try to drive a car with
wheels that had spokes and no hub? Not easy. Thus
the trend we are seeing within the Apple Community
is to spoke our hubs, or to hub our spokes. It may
not be of the magnitude of cosmological red shifts,
and certainly Edwin Hubble would not be impressed,
but there is going to be an awful lot red eyes out
there thanks to Apple, and we are sure that Canon,
Olympus, Minolta, and Nikon, et al, are going to
have a jolly good time thanks to Apple, iPhoto,
and something called “the digital hub.”

To wit…

The wonderful Olympus 3020Z
3.2 megapixel camera. The images are sharp and
clear, and it has Olympus’ new "noise reduction"
technology which helps in low-light situations
and focal distance. The camera is sturdy, and
compatible with iPhoto for hours and hours of
plug-n-play fun. But be sure to get an AC adapter,
some rechargeable batteries, and a UV filter
and lens adapter to protect the 3x optical zoom
lense. The menu system is intuitive and does
not take long to learn. It has the capability
take 90 second QuickTime movies, which you can
then load into iMovie and edit. This is the
digital hub gone crazy, crazy fun that is. The
only fault with this camera is that is lacks
audio capabilities and a remote, which is crucial
in night-time, long exposure settings, or taking
pictures of your wild kitty or slobbering newborn.
The camera is a joy to use and is both fully
automatic or fully manual, right for prosumers
and consumers alike.

This is Olympus’ latest
model, but look for new models from all camera
companies on Feb. 24-25, at the PMA Expo, which
is kind of like the Macworld Expo for photo-addicts.
Right now might be a good time to buy (prices
are going down with the Expo around the corner),
or wait (for new models). Either way, it’s a
win-win situation for consumers.

Unlike iMovie or iDVD, digicams are much less expensive
than digicorders. You can start out at $100 if you
wish, or, depending on megapixel size and features,
go from $400 to $1400 dollars. A good 3-4 megapixel
camera costs around $500-$700 at this time and prices
will fall. The point is that getting some pretty advanced
partner technology for iPhoto in everyday consumers
hands is much cheaper than for iDVD or iMovie. This
has made the digicam ubiquitous to say the least.
There are lots and lots of people out there who needed
iPhoto in the first place. It is, in once sense, a
perfect fit with current trends in the digital market.

The media for digicam is cheaper than
DVD disks and in the same area as for CD-Rs. Many
use Flash SmartMedia. A 64 MG SmartMedia card can
be had for around $30-$40, and it can hold anywhere
from 250 to 16 pictures depending on the resolution
of shots. The consumer, in other words, just as Steve
is assuming, can accumulate a lot of digital information
in a very short period of time, and it becomes unruly
and in need of organization. Thus, iPhoto’s “Organize
like Martha” theme.

But forget about memory cards. Some
cameras, like the wonderful Olympus
3020
(and the list is growing), have built in
USB allowing you to connect them right into your iBook
to import all those pictures of the kitty pretty darn
quickly. The ability of a digicam to produce lots
of digital files (easier than downloading MP3s from
Gnuetella), that have to be organized quickly, transfering
all those files to your iBook, means we need a digi-Martha
to help us out. The digital files are smaller than
digital film, about the same as an MP3 file, and can
be produced at a rabbit’s pace by simply picking up
your camera and shooting like Ansel. iPhoto to the
rescue.

What is more cameras, digital or not, are a familiar
technology to all consumers. We have been taking pictures
our whole lives, and so a digital camera feels familiar
and is non-threatening to most people (unlike a digicorder,
or even for some an MP3 player, which have not been
in circulation as long as cameras). Given this sense
of familiarity, many more people already have a digicam,
more than MP3 players. And show no hesitation using
them. Thus, a large amount of data is being produced
and a digital hub is a necessity in the modern point-and-click,
point-and-shoot, click-and-drag, digital world.

What all this means is that iPhoto
is the perfect solution for consumers right now, and
it’s only available on a Mac. However, in a gadgeteer’s
zeal to preserve memories and capture instants, few
realize that a digicam is a whole new beast from a
standard SLR. Many of the same rules for good photography
either do not apply or are transformed in different
ways with a digicam. Many are fully automatic (a complaint
that “real” photographers have against many cameras),
thus allowing millions to use the technology right
out of the box. Some have auto and fully manual
modes. The features, the internal architecture of
a digicam (its CCD for example), its card slot, its
USB connection, its digital zoom as opposed to its
optical zoom, all mean that even though it looks like
we are just buying a camera, we are actually buying
into a whole new technology (externally they look
the same, but internally and functionally they are
very different).

Ergo: People have to learn several things
about digicams:

1. How to buy one.
The purchasing rules for a digicam are different
than traditional cameras.

2. How to use one.
The use of a digicam vis-a-vis a traditional camera
is different.

3. What to do with the
files
. Digicams create pictures in seconds,
not “One Hour Photos.” How do we use these files?
Print them? Save them? Touch them up? Correct or
enhance? All the elements which the “digital darkroom”
pros deal with everyday are now in millions of consumers
hands. There is a lot to learn. In fact, many don’t
know what a digital file even is, in its essence
that is, how it behaves, how it prints, its resolution,
and so on are all new.

4. Getting the most out
of it
. Sure, you have your digicam, and there
is a lot of potential in your hand… now what?
Olympus ships some cameras with Photoshop Elements.
Another thing to learn. We can melt, twist, bend,
colorize, blur, apply hundreds of filters, add textures,
make frames, and hundreds of other tasks with these
new digital files that are accumulating on our digital
desktops. Where is a consumer to go? Where is he
to learn the basics and the rules of the digital
road?

So that fact is that the digital cameras
have not only opened up a new toy for consumers, but
have landed them on whole new planet and they need
a map to scope out the new territory. iPhoto, with
its ease of use, means that consumers find themselves
in digital darkrooms on digital desktops having no
digital idea what to do or how. iPhoto is boon, but
it also means millions of people have a lot to learn.

iPhoto Finish

All of what I have just said doesn’t
matter if people don’t have digicams anyway. What
we have seen, the trend in the Mac Community, since
iPhoto was released, is that Mac users, with iPhoto
installed, are flocking to stores to buy cameras.
Instead of needing iPhoto because we have digicams,
it seems that many need digicams because they now
have iPhoto.

It is happening at Applelust in fact.
Two writers instantly began the search for a new camera.
A third, yours truly, began the search for one even
though he has a low-end one, and I have been doing demos
of iPhoto in a store with an Olympus 3020 loaned to
me. I have gone to three stores in town and asked about
sales and have been told that Mac users are coming in
buying cameras. Another Applelust writer recently got
a CoolPix and will be writing about his
experiences with it
.

The sea change we are seeing is that
Mac users are going out and buying digicams. They
need a resource, a place to find help with the issues
I mentioned above, and they want help which is Mac-centric.

Applelust.com intends to be the safe
house for all those new digicam shooting, iPhoto organizing,
Photoshop Elements or PixelNHance newbies out there
who want to get the most from their new toys. And
when Applelust makes a decision (your humble Editor
is lovingly called “Applelust Tyrannical Overlord”
by staff), we will follow through on it and do it
the best we can. So look no more, “Help is on the
way.”

In conclusion, there is a trend we
at Applelust have picked up on, namely, that many
Mac consumers are trying to make the switch to digital
cameras because the Mac Community has been given iPhoto.
Rather than helping us with managing megabytes of
digidata from antecedently purchased cameras, iPhoto
is motivating Mac users to go out and grab a digicam,
or another one, or a higher end one, so they can “Shoot
like Ansel; organize like Martha.” They will need
help making the move, and using the new toy. We at
Applelust are happy to be your guides.

So what are you doing? Get up and start
capturing moments and preserving memories! For now,
help is on the way in the form of a group of professionals
at Applelust ready to assist you to grow into your
own digital age.

David
Schultz

 

Is the Mac Web Selling Its Soul?

On January 28, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bob McCormick

Start saving your nickels and dimes, ’cause this column is going to cost you.

Have you been to MacFixIt lately? Well, if you want to figure out what’s conflicting with that QuickTime extension on your Mom’s iMac, you’re going to have to pay.

Want the inside scoop from MacOS Rumors? Well if you “donate” to them, they’ll put you on their Sponsor’s e-mail list! Wow, donate? You mean rumors are now Tax Deductible?

Want to listen to the whole two hours of “The Mac Show”? Well pony up kids ’cause it’s going to cost you now.

Speaking of which, let’s all stand up right now and give Shawn King a standing ovation for walking away and starting “Your Mac Life” when push came to shove, he didn’t back down. Amen! Finally, someone has stood up against this disturbing trend of “pay for content” on the Mac Web.

I remember when I got my first Mac. Experienced Mac users used to help me F.O.C. (that’s free of charge) whenever I needed it. I remember when I had finally gained enough knowledge and experience to be able to pay that all back; I’d share it with new Mac users. I’d help people choose their first Macs. It was fun, it still is. I’m going over to my sister’s house to teach her how to use her Clip Art CDs on her new iMac. Helping is a part of what made the Mac different to me. It helped give it a soul.

When I finally got onto the Internet, I was thrilled to find that same Macintosh culture had translated onto the web with e-mail lists, web sites, and helpful people in chat rooms. All of those helpful things, because of the Mac community. Nobody charged for content, tips or help. What few sites I did find that charged weren’t Mac sites and I didn’t patronize them.

But now with the recent advent of these pay for content schemes, it has me wondering if the Mac Web is going to end up selling it’s soul. It just seems that it’s the antithesis of what the Mac community has always been about.

If you’ve ever seen the PBS special, Nerds 2.0: A Brief History of the Internet, there once was some much loftier goals for the Internet. Imagine, digitizing the entire Library of Congress. And that’s just the beginning. Imagine being able to read any book, ever written at any time of the day or night. Imagine being able to ‘check out’ any movie, magazine, etc. The web could have been so much more than just another heat island of a strip mall designed to easily separate a man from his wallet’s contents. I thought that the Mac Web had in fact come closer to the loftier goals than most others.

Don’t get me wrong. There is something wonderful about shopping at midnight in your pajamas. I love the convenience of comparison-shopping in my home without driving all over town. I just believe that the Internet can be more.

It just seems wrong to me to charge people in the Mac community for content. It’s like my trip over to my sister’s house after I wrap this column up. Should I charge her mileage and a one-hour minimum? If my friend at work gets a new Mac, should I whip out my business card and tell them ’bout my rates? No way!

I recently wrote Shawn King after listening to his new “Your Mac Life.” I wrote him and applauded him for his “courage and insanity” to stand up for what truly he believes. It’s that same courage and insanity that it takes each one of us to use a Mac in a Windows dominated world. Just goes to show you, Shawn King “gets it.” We’re all in this together.

I know that the bottom dropped out of Web advertising. Fewer businesses are paying and paying less for what ads that do get purchased. If you are on the web to make money then it seems to me that you have to hunker down and find a way to make it pay. Add more advertisements, add bigger ones, whatever it might take, or, scale back.

But asking people to pay for content with advertisements seems like PBS having donation drives and then interrupting Frontline in the middle of a show with a two minute commercial break complete with Jack in the Box commercials.

I hope charging for content is just a passing growing pain of the Mac web. It may be it’s a portent of things to come, I don’t know. There has to be a way to make the Web pay and I hope that everyone discovers it shortly. In the meantime, I’ve got to get going. I need to get over to my sister’s house and help her with her new iMac. What do you think, should I charge her for my visit?

Editors note: MyMac.com will never charge its readers a dime to read our content. As one of the longest running Mac websites on the internet today (second only to MacInTouch, I believe) we have stayed committed to our original goal: to provide good, fun, and educational content to Macintosh users free of charge.


Bob McCormick

 

Working on the Dark Side – Part Seven

On January 28, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Roger Born

The Lie

One of the oddest abilities of Man is the ability to believe a lie. No other creature has this dubious distinction. The current Lie of the decade is the one that every computer user is faced with, as they are deluged with all the propaganda and misinformation out there, and as they face their employers and every IT person who is promoting it. The Lie is everywhere, and few people there are who do not succumb to it.

What is the Lie? It is that Microsoft is the only business software supplier, and that the PC is the only business computer there is.

Amazing! Business computing today is like the final days of the Third Reich, or the last days of the Taliban, where everyone says “Everything is fine, fine!” and where no one dares to voice the truth of the situation.

The truth is that every user of Microsoft applications, its browser, and any version of Windows OS are working with a major handicap, which directly affects their business data productivity, security, and reliability.

Legion are the users who have lost time and data to their faulty MS software. Uncountable are the hours people have spent rebuilding their computers and hard drives and rewriting their files, because of Microsoft’s trashware. This is such a major problem in business that I think we could link the failing state of our economy directly to the failure of Microsoft’s applications and OS in business.

You and I, being Mac users, know the true condition of business computing, don’t we?

SO WHY DUMP ON APPLE?

The thing that surprises me, but shouldn’t, are all the latest high profile business articles dumping on Apple and the Mac. Why is it that the more successful and the more visible Apple and the Mac become to the business community, the more misinformed articles also appear?

There is a reason for these articles. People who use Windows and Microsoft applications have a need to support the Lie. Therefore, such well placed articles trashing the Mac and Apple Computer are vital and necessary to promote their belief in that lie. The truth about the Macintosh is a threat to the Lie.

Here are links to some of these misinformed articles concerning Apple Computer and the Macintosh. You can examine these for yourself to see how perverse the Lie is, and how many well known journalists and commentators are promoting it, at the expense of the truth about computers and computing. I think you will love the excellent replies by our own journalists too.

Apple: At What Price Innovation?” By Scot Petersen of eWEEK
This article is full of misinformation, which totally ignores Apple’s innovation in software and in their new OS. A person reading this article would think the only claim to fame Apple has is in its pretty computer designs.

Charles Moore has an excellent article setting right the misconceptions and misinformation of Michael S. Malone, Editor at Large for Forbes ASAP, who suggests that Steve Jobs has become the Raymond Loewy of computer design, and that he is turning Apple into the Studebaker of PC makers.

Irked!” by My Mac Columnist Bob McCormick. Bob cited this misinformed article in BUSINESS WEEK “Finally, a Chance for Apple to Flourish” Bob did a great job of showing where the misinformation was.

Peter Cohen of MacCentral has an excellent response to the misinformation from Business 2.0′s Eric Hellweg.

The Best Revenge” By Robert X. Cringely. This article suggests that Steve Jobs does not care whether Apple gains market share, and it explains why. It also explains the thinking of both Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, and goes to length to dispel misinformation about the Mac.

WHY BELIEVE THE LIE?

When people buy into the idea of a lie, they think they do it for survival. These people are very conservative. They think their business depends on supporting the poor business decision they made in buying those Windows PCs in the first place. Once they go down that road, there is no turning back.

Perhaps others do not want to appear different, so they do what everyone else does. This means they use the PC and MS software by default. These business people are compared to Lemmings, and rightly so. Some managers in business are terrified of anything new. You probably know someone like this. They are far more comfortable believing the lie about Microsoft than boldly stepping out for a better computer. For them, the Lie is safe. They really don’t care if their computers work or not. They just want to be like everyone else. If this is true about them, how sound are their other business practices?

Some business managers really are clueless concerning computers. Computing is a new way of doing business for them, so they place all their trust in their highly paid IT personnel. After all, those IT people are employed to install and operate their networks, and to keep all their PCs running. Those people know what they are doing, right? If they say MS is the only computing software, why, it must be true! You know how those IT people will vote about their computer systems, right? How many of them would be without work if their company switched to Mac or Unix servers, and computers? About ninety per cent of them.

THE HEART OF THE LIE

We have talked before in this series about the failure of production in American business, and how Bill Gates and Microsoft have cost businesses trillions of dollars in lost revenue because of their shoddy and unsecure software. Yet most people will never do anything about it.

It runs counter to logic and good sense to ignore this problem, but people do, don’t they? It is more convenient for people in business to believe the Lie than to fix the problem or to look for a better computing solution. If you work in a business that uses the PC, and if your company is in lockstep with Microsoft and their propaganda, you understand what I mean.

Just try to mention to your boss that a Macintosh can do productive work better than your PC. Try telling them that Macintoshes can be easily networked with their PCs. Attempt to explain to them how many great software titles there are for the business Mac, and that your company can save thousands or millions of dollars if they switched to the more stable and productive Macintosh computer.

You know the result of your efforts, right? “My mind is made up, don’t show me the truth!”

HERE IS THE TRUTH

I think THIS is the major difference between Mac users and the users of computers running on Microsoft: People who use Macintoshes are perhaps are innately more honest about themselves and their world than their counterparts working on the dark side.

You can take this paradigm from the Macintosh itself. Macs are honest computers. Files go where you want them to. You can always find them again. That is never true of a PC running Windows. The size of any drive or file is always knowable on a Mac, whereas a Windows PC will actually lie to you about where a file is, or how big it is, or if it is deleted or not. And, of course, what you see on the screen is what you print.

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

If you know the truth about the Mac, how stable and productive it is, and if you know how open and free its computing experience can be, then you need to promote the Mac as the best computer for your business. Do this so that your company can be more productive and a better competitor in your markets.

You have to be discrete when you speak for what is true. You should always be polite and gracious in your speech and in your actions. After all, these people are opposing themselves and their own best interests more than they are opposing you.

Remember that the best computer for your business may not always be a Mac. Yet a company who values its employees and their morale, and who is interested in extending their bottom line by making everyone more productive and protecting their data, the Macintosh running the OS X is a logical, and true choice for them.

Here are two final links that are the very best for promoting what is true about computing. First is Apple’s own site created to dispel all the misinformation about the Macintosh. The other is an excellent resource showing the Mac as the more productive and cost effective computer over a PC.

SPEAKING FOR THE TRUTH

Hey, the truth is out there. I know sometimes you might feel like Mulder or Scully as you promote the Mac, but the truth has to be put on the table for everyone to see. You might believe telling the truth is a lost cause, but it is not, by any means!

The truth is, Microsoft is now on the ropes, besieged by the Justice Department, by several states, and now by AOL/TimeWarner. Their illegal and immoral business practices are finally getting some justice, or at least some acknowledgment by the public. This will help wake up many business as they seek other, more secure and productive computers and platforms. They might even choose the Macintosh you suggested.

What is at stake is much more than Apple’s market share. What is at stake is our country’s success in competition in the business world, and the survival of our global economy. All of our businesses need to be more productive and more on the cutting edge of technology. You and I know they will never get there using Microsoft applications and the Windows OS. But they could get there using the Mac.

If you don’t already know it, the most successful and productive and cutting edge companies in America are all run on the Mac.

Now is the right time to speak up for the Mac so that people can know that there is a real and true alternative to their computing problems.

The true solution to professional business computing needs is a Macintosh. In fact, it always has been a better solution, so spread the word!


Roger Born

 

Kibbles and Bytes – 501

On January 27, 2002, in Sponsor, by SmallDog


Okay, one of my 2007 predictions has already gone by the wayside. It was -12° F at my house this morning and it never got above zero as I drove to Burlington this morning.   I just got a call from my neighbor who I share a water system with and it is frozen so we are thawing some pipes, too!    Yes, there is still a winter. Nevertheless, we are getting seed catalogs and the days are getting longer so it won’t be long and we will have broken the back of winter!

Anyone have a spare SuperBowl ticket?  Finally, all the New England Patriots fans in my office shut up.   Well, except for Rob Amon who, in a state of denial, declared “they didn’t really lose!”    This Bears fan on the other hand has two whole weeks to gloat and get ready for the SuperBowl.    Geoff tried to convince me to go to Miami but once I started looking at the prices of tickets on eBay, I decided that a SuperBowl celebration at my house will do just fine! All I can say is DA BEARS!

Continue reading »

 

The Health Care Crisis Comes to Town, Big Time

On January 25, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bruce Black

I was going to write about something darkly funny this time, but something has come up this week, and I feel the need to vent. It involves the near total collapse of our nations health care system. Sooner or later, it’s going to hit you where you live. I know, because that’s exactly what happened to me, here in Waltham, Massachusetts, this past week. I mean this literally. It has, quite simply, hit us Waltham residents like a scud missile. (And no, that’s not a reference to the urban myth about an Iraqi scud missile hitting the city of Lowell during the gulf war, and causing ten million dollars worth of improvements.)

First, let me explain that in my first forty-five years here, I have been blessed with good health. I’ve been getting annual physical checkups since I turned forty, and everything checks out ok. I’ve had a few minor problems though, such as suffering a “small ligament tear” during the height of bicycling season, two years ago, the occasional bout of winter time colds and flu. Big deal. So, what’s my problem, when there are so many with serious health issues? It’s this: The well-respected, much loved Deaconess-Waltham Hospital is going to close. Yes indeed, another local hospital, with a lot of patients who depend on it for their health care, is going to be shut down, by its parent corporation, Caregroup Health Systems.

Some brief history is in order. The Deaconess-Waltham Hospital was founded officially in 1885. For most of its existence, it was simply known as “The Waltham Hospital”. This hospital is small, by modern hospital standards. It has 108 beds. But it boasts all the modern equipment and facilities that are commonly associated with huge hospitals, such as the behemoth Mass General. It has a state-of-the-art emergency room, which treats an average of 20,000 people annually. This emergency room is famous for it’s ability to see patients quickly, even when it gets swamped. I know this firsthand, as I have been treated there twice, once after a minor cycling accident ten years ago, (a woman with an obviously low I.Q. “doored” me) and once when a nasty flu virus caused me to faint on the floor at my job. The caring attitude and quality of care I received on both occasions makes me think that maybe these doctors and nurses and medical technicians should be wearing halo’s instead of green scrubs. My sister had her appendix removed there, and other family members have been treated there for a variety of oddities. So much for history. If you ask residents of the Waltham area, you’ll find plenty of tales, very similar to mine. Oh yes, 1200 people are employed there, making the Deaconess-Waltham hospital the city’s largest employer.

This community hospital has survived for more than one hundred years. It has sat there, on a hilltop, and seen two world wars, a great depression, and has been the place where generations of people have been born and have died. But, it cannot survive the “mismanaged health care” system that now exists. My question, simply, is why? How can this possibly be? At what point in time did our hospital system come under the control of bean counters, when it should be in the control of doctors and skilled hospital administrators? Something stinks, sort of like the Fleet Center Men’s room, after a big Bruins playoff game.

I live a short distance away from Deaconess-Waltham, on a road which is frequently used by the ambulance services to rescue people who have been in motor vehicle accidents on busy route 128. The ambulances go back and fourth, several times per evening, more frequently during holiday weekends in summer. I am wondering what will happen, when they no longer have the emergency room at Deaconess-Waltham. The next nearest facility is Newton-Wellesley, five miles distant. The staff, which runs that department, has already stated that on some occasions, they may not be able to handle the additional load. What’s next? The big hospitals in Boston are there, a half-hour distant by ambulance. Give additional time if the roads are snow-clogged, or it it’s “rush hour”, and there has been some sort of traffic anomaly which results in gridlock. That time could mean a lot, if someone is having a serious coronary arrest, or a bad diabetic episode.

And yes, they have big-city emergency departments, which frequently must “shut down”, and admit no more patients, because they get too overloaded. (And quality of care does indeed suffer, but that is something I cannot address here.)

So, what happens now? State law requires that ninety days of notice be given to the state health board, prior to closure. This has been done. A public hearing must also be held. It has been scheduled for February 11th, at 6 PM, at Waltham High School. I imagine that at that meeting, there will be a lot of grandstanding by local politicians. (There has been a lot of that already) But, I suspect that this is probably “it”. One must ponder what else is going to happen, and what has already happened. Doctor Alan Woodward, President of the medical staff of Emerson Hospital in Concord, told the Boston Globe that since he started practicing medicine in 1981, he has seen 40 community hospitals such as Deaconess-Waltham shut down. This is something that makes me feel that there is some sort of insidious, long-term plan at work. Paranoid? Crazy? Tell it to the parents of an eleven-year-old, who needs emergency room treatment and an overnight hospital stay because of a diabetic problem. Tell it to a police officer that has been stabbed while trying to break up a Friday night fight between two drunken white trashers. Tell it to a teenaged girl who was making progress with an eating disorder, but now must start all over with a new doctor, at a different hospital, because Deaconess-Waltham is being forced to close.

I think that when I am bicycling around town, I’ll take extra care to try not to get “doored”. (For those not aware, that’s when some careless person opens their car door, without checking for approaching cyclists. Arguably, one of the worst kinds of accidents which can befall a bike rider, especially since there is no defense for it.)

Watch your health.


Bruce Black

 

Tri-BACKUP 3.0.4
Company: Tri-Edre
Price: $49.00
(Online Download – English version)
http://www.tri-edre.com

One of the most important things that any computer user must do is backup, backup, backup, their hard drive and any important files. The staff of My Mac has reiterated that statement time after time.

That’s why when the situation presented itself to try out Tri-Edre’s Tri-BACKUP software, I jumped at the chance. Yes, I already back up my hard drive using two other programs that afford me two different ways of doing this but I’m always interested in seeing what else is out there for Mac users.

Installation is simple once you’ve gotten the downloaded version of Tri-BACKUP. Double-click the icon to run Tri-BACKUP. The first time you launch it, you’ll be prompted to enter your serial number (which is sent by email) and you’re ready to go.

Tri-BACKUP offers the user several ways of backing up their drives or selected items. Immediate Actions are designed to run a backup or a synchronization very quickly and easily with a just a few settings. User actions can be backing up a folder or a disk, restoring a file, a folder or an entire volume, synchronizing a folder/disk or compressing/uncompressing a folder’s content. Programmed Actions can be set for repetitious actions or actions that you want done automatically. The settings of these actions are saved and can be automatically and regularly scheduled and run without any intervention of the user. Programmed actions can be backup of folders and disks (with three different modes available: mirror, evolutive and incremental), synchronization of two folders or disks, compression, uncompression and protection of a folder’s content.

Mirror Backups creates an exact copy of a folder or the entire contents of any volume/disk that you choose. Evolutive Mirror Backups creates an exact copy of a folder or entire content of any volume that you choose. During each backup, the copy is updated to remain identical to the source folder. INCREMENTAL BACKUP: this mode allows you to keep a copy of every version of a document. During each backup, Tri-BACKUP copies only the files that have been modified since the last backup, creating a new folder for each backup (previous backups are not overwritten).

Tri-BACKUP also has the capability of the Backup Browser. This function offers a quick, easy way to explore the contents of mounted volumes, and to see the files and the related programmed actions. This window displays on the left side the content of the mounted volumes. The user can browse through the folders and subfolders with icons in front of each file showing their status depending on the selected action. The list on the right displays the programmed actions the user created. Marks relate to the selected file and the selection of an action displays which files are supposed to (or not) be copied while this action is running.

When you open up the Tri-BACKUP app, you’re presented with a window with 4 Immediate Actions: Backup, Restore, Synchronize or Compression. Below that are the listings of Programmed Actions that the user sets up for the application to run. The package also includes a PDF version of the manual, so if you just take the time to read through it, you shouldn’t have any problems determining what you what to do. Visit Tri-Edre’s web site and check it out.

I’ve been giving Tri-BACKUP a workout since I got it, trying out immediate actions and setting up programmed actions. Then I finally put it to the acid test. I had purchased a 20 gig Maxtor hard drive to replace my existing 8 gig hard drive in my 6400/180 (with a G3 card installed and running OS 9.1) here and wanted to see how Tri-BACKUP would work out. I used it to back up my entire drive to another internal drive, installed the new drive, formatted it and then used Tri-BACKUP to restore the entire drive. I had no problems at all, just blessed the system folder when I went to restart and it’s worked fine, no problems. I continue to use it to do a third backup of all my data.

System Requirements: Mac OS 8.6 or 9.x, with the latest copy of CarbonLib installed in the System folder. Tri-BACKUP runs natively on OS X and, as of the time of this review, is the first backup product for OS X. It can create and restore a bootable Mac OS X volume (this needs to login as “root” or user with full permission).

MacMice Rating: 4 out of 5


Russ Walkowich

Tagged with:  

Byte Me! – Holy Microsoft

On January 22, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Ralph J Luciani

As memories of goodwill to men and the singing of Christmas carols fade from the hearts of the faithful let us turn our thoughts to a subject that is less sacred. My favourite topic is this realm is, of course, Microsoft – the Evil Empire, the Wicked Monopoly or the pearly Gates down under. But, as loathed as I am to admit it, the house of Bill has much that is holy – not blessed to be sure by definitely holy.

April 2, 2001
Microsoft is issuing a security patch for its Internet Explorer web browser, which could automatically open corrupted e-mail attachments without user intervention.

June 8, 2001
A computer virus that targets Web systems using Microsoft software packs a double punch. This time the worm is selective, attacking only Microsoft software and sending profane e-mail bombs to founder Bill Gates.

June 20, 2001
Windows Servers, XP Beta, Reveal New Security Flaws A new threat of infection in an old wound at Microsoft has again forced the software giant to issue patches for server software used on millions of Windows NT 4.0 and Windows 2000 systems, as well as the beta version of the company’s new Windows XP operating system.

Oct. 19, 2001
Microsoft has yet to find a security hole it doesn’t like, and Windows XP is no exception. In this case, the raw sockets feature can allow creators of denial of service (DoS) attacks untold levels of new power in their quest to bring the Internet to its knees. More

Oct. 22, 2001
Experts cite XP’s remote desktop functionality as the biggest potential security hole in Windows XP. By allowing a help desk individual to take over the desktop, there could be security exposures where hackers could slip in and take control of the machine if it is not handled and installed properly.

Oct. 22, 2001
Within hours of the operating system’s launch on October 25, malicious coders in Asia began distributing a software program over the Internet. The program allows users to bypass Microsoft’s Product Activation technology, which is designed to prevent users from installing a copy of Windows XP on multiple computers

Dec. 20 2001
Microsoft may have touted Windows XP as the most secure operating system it has made, but a security hole was discovered that could leave some people’s systems open to malicious attack. “This is pretty much the worst default vulnerability in any Windows operating system,” a security expert said.

Dec. 24, 2001
Less than two months after releasing Windows XP — dubbed its most secure operating system ever — Microsoft said it had detected a second serious security hole in the software. The company is issuing a patch for Windows XP, Windows ME and Windows 98 systems for what Scott Culp, manager of Microsoft’s Security Response Center, said is a “very serious vulnerability.”

Dec. 27, 2001
The FBI’s National Infrastructure Protection Center says there are two security vulnerabilities in Microsoft’s Windows XP software that are susceptible to hackers

Jan. 14, 2002
Engineers are working to fix a glitch in a Microsoft Web server that has prevented Windows XP users from downloading software updates, including a patch for a security hole.

Jan. 15, 2002
Network and System Security
Reference books, online seminars, firewalls etc.

After web publication of Bill Gates recent internal Microsoft e-mail on security he was asked about holes in various Windows products. During the questioning period, MSN facilities failed. However, before the connection was terminated it was believed that Mr. Gates was heard to ask, ÒWhat security holes?Ó

ÓDuring the question period he was also critical of Department of Justice officials who he characterized as being blinded in their frenzy to bring his company down. At one point he was thought to have said ÒWhat’s good enough for Microsoft is good enough for the country.Ó What country he was speaking of was not immediately clear.

From the files of the Byte Me! Network where Truth is suspect if it is a lie!


Ralph J. Luciani

 

Why Apple’s Market Share is Fine By Me!

On January 22, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Tim Robertson

Right now, Apple owns less than 5% of the computer market place in new computer sales. (Ever notice they never measure installed user base, those with older computers still in use? Apple would be WAY over 5% if they measured that one.) Many writers on the Mac web write columns and articles on what Apple could/should do to increase that number. Apple never reads those articles, of course, nor do they (Apple) really care what opinion we hold on the matter. But every week, on at least one Mac centric website, some writer is telling us how Apple can get a larger market share.

OS X on Intel machines
Windows on Mac natively
Get rid of the Motorola partnership
Much more advertising

And the list goes on.

I, however, don’t care about any of the above. Like any other Mac user, I do try to get people to buy Mac when they come to me for computer buying advice. I know how great it is, and I know they would love a Mac, too, if they only gave it a chance. But I know my efforts are pretty much wasted.

Question. WHY do we want to see the market share of Mac’s grow? Is it because we really love these machines, and want our fellow computer users to know and understand the real joy of computing? If that is the case, why do so many Mac users argue with die-hard PC users? There is no chance the Mac user will ever convince the PC user to switch, and the opposite is also true.

So what do we care? Is it a defensive action on our part as Mac users, to try and justify to ourselves the purchase decision we made when we paid money for a computer most other computer users do not use?

Whatever the case may be, I am actually quite happy with my Mac. I am also quite happy with the market share the Macintosh holds. One of the reasons I like the Mac so much is its superior design and function. I like having tools (programs) not every one else has. I like showing an iMovie I made to a PC using friend, to see their eyes light up, only to find out they cannot do that with their PC, that you need a Mac to do it with. And that the software used to create the film is actually free!

If everyone had a Corvette, would it still be as special as it is? If you owned one, and half the people on your street did as well, would the prestige still be there for you?

If you lived in a twenty-room mansion, and everyone else did as well, would the living in a mansion still have the appeal it would otherwise?

If everyone were a millionaire, would being a millionaire loose its meaning?

If everyone used a Mac, would you spend as much time as you do talking up the Mac to your PC using friends?

I like the Macs market share just fine, thanks. I like knowing I can do much more with my computer easily than most PC users. I like knowing I own the best. I love to hear all the problems PC users have with viruses, with machines always breaking down, with crappy beige boxes gathering dust under the floor of their desk.

I like owning a Mac, because doing so actually does say something about who I am.


Tim Robertson

 

Irked!

On January 22, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bob McCormick

Recently on the MyMac.com e-mail list Ralph J. Luciani one our terrific writers gave us a great heads up on a whole special report that BusinessWeek.com had posted. Not one to pass up a chance to read about Apple, especially from the business press I anxiously clicked the link Ralph had supplied.

After reading all of the articles, I came away really irked by the whole thing. There were a some glaring mistakes made by a couple of the writers and it made me realize that Apple may never get a fair shake from the business press.

The first mistake I found was in the article by Alex Salkever. In that article he was referring to iPhoto as being a part of the Digital Hub strategy that Apple is following. In it, there was this sentence. “Both iFilm and iTunes were out long before iPhoto.”

Uhhh iFilm?? Does business week know something we don’t know? Maybe BusinessWeek pulled a Time Magazine and let it slip that they were introducing a new piece of hardware? A real live film editor with a digital interface for the Mac! iFilm would be a great interface for digitizing all those ancient 16mm films your parents recorded when you were a kid! How neat! Or had the business/mainstream press done their usual great job of researching Apple? That errant reference to a piece of non-existent software or hardware has since been corrected on BusinessWeek’s website but wow, publications like BusinessWeek have fact checkers, research departments. They couldn’t even get iMovie right?

There was something else in that same article that was completely ridiculous to me. In trying to support his view about how Apple had become a niche company he made the point that Apple’s earnings are tied to successive product launches. “So, if Apple is to move up in the pack, the trick is to sustain early momentum. It succeeded at doing so with the original iMac, but the company also has had some big misses, as with the Newton handheld computer and the G4 Cube, a cube-shaped computer aimed at power users that flopped because of its limited expansion capabilities and high price.”

The NEWTON? That’s just crazy! The Newton came at least three CEO’s before Steve Job’s return. By putting that in the context of the Cube, it would seem to a reader unfamiliar with Apple that the Newton was a recent misstep by Steve Jobs’ since his return. Is this revisionist history or does this reporter have so little to support his point as to have to pull the Newton into the current management’s supposed “big misses.”

Originally, I let the all the above slide. After all, there’s no such thing as bad press. I went on to read the other stories and when I got to the story by Amey Stone, I was furious at a misleading statement that only a bare minimum of research would have eliminated. But since that research didn’t support the writer’s point, well, I digress.

In “Thinking Different about Apple’s Stock,” Amey Stone wrote that Apple’s stock through the crazy market of 2001 had, “traded between 15 and 25, and at $22 on Jan. 18, it’s right where it was three years ago.”

That is so completely misleading that it isn’t even funny. Amey doesn’t seem to remember or bothered to have checked to see that Apple had a stock split in the summer of 2000. Meaning, if adjusted for the stock split, the price of Apple’s stock would be equivalent to 44 dollars! Or depending how you look at it, retained virtually ALL of it’s value through was one of the worst years of the stock market, 2001.

That was just distorting the facts if you ask me, because overall Apple is up nearly 340% in five years. And yes, I did adjust for the stock split. Gee, that doesn’t sound all that bad to me and I’m not even a business whiz.

All the inaccuracies and revisionist history in articles like this just irks me. BusinessWeek is not alone. I notice these types of errors all over the web in the mainstream and business press. It just shows that Apple is one of the most un-researched and misunderstood companies out there. This is just the latest round.

Distortions, revisionist history, and bad research, it all makes me wonder how good any of their advice could possibly be, all this from a company that was pushing Enron as good investment. Well, I think they did. I’ll just have our MyMac research department check on that and I’ll get back to you.


Bob McCormick

 

I Am The Anti-Bob Vila

On January 21, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bob McCormick

Prologue:
I’m not an unintelligent person, at work I have root access to the UNIX machines, I’ve outfitted my desktop Mac with RAM and Video upgrades. I even installed a SCSI card and drive and was able to make it work in OS X. Some of you may know that I’m an accomplished public speaker and can speak in front a live audience, without notes even! I’ve written and been published here at MyMac.com. I can discuss the philosophical possibilities of quantum physics, find extension conflicts in Classic Mac OS as well as hack OS X at the root level. But if you ask me to begin a home improvement project you had best not even be in the same county ’cause the odds are, it’s going to blow!

I had a vacation recently. Vacations that leave me more exhausted than when they began don’t make any sense to me. I decided to spend my vacation leisurely catching up on sleep, reading, surfing and finally tacking some home improvement projects. You see, I recently became a first time homeowner and figured it was time to fix up a few things around the house.

What could go wrong? I thought. Besides, my house included an extra safety feature that even Tim Allen could appreciate. It resides directly across the street from Fire Station #4. If all else failed, I could always pick up my thumb, run across the street and they’d rush me to the hospital, I joked inside my head.

Through this experience, however, I discovered that I am in fact evil. Like the Wolf Man, I have a side of me that loved ones and the public at large must be protected from. In the end, most likely, someone is going to have to hire Buffy to slay me with a Stanley™T-Square driven through my heart with a genuine Craftsman™ hammer. Read on, you’ll see what horrors lurk deep within me.

What follows, is a100% true story. No names, dates, or places were changed to protect the innocent.

Act One: “A Bright Idea.”


After a few days of leisure, I finally thought I might actually try to at least begin some simple projects around the house. The first thing I contemplated was what color to paint a bookshelf I have. While I was considering that I remembered some white oak stain that I had picked up for the wood walls in my living room. (With a house built in the 50s, there’s plenty of “Blonde Wood” around. UGH!) Well last fall I bought the white stain to hopefully do something with those blonde wood walls. It has been sitting in the garage ever since. I wanted to see what the white stain would look like.

That was a bIIIiiiiggg mistake, huge mistake, nothing bigger. Think of the ominous music that plays just before someone opens Pandora’s box or before the Nazi’s opened the Ark of the Covenant in “Raiders of the Lost Ark.” If only I had left that wood stain alone.

Picture the handiest person you can think of, the absolute most “Mr. Fix-It” kind of man on the face of the earth, someone who can make any home improvement project look easy. Maybe you’ll think of your own father, or your grandfather, possibly even a neighbor. Maybe you have cable and you think of the guys from “Furniture to Go” or anyone from the Home and Garden channel. The first person that comes to my mind is Bob Vila.

Now imagine the complete and total antithesis of Bob Vila, completely inept with a tool, a brush, sander, power tool or absolutely anything suburban. Seriously, imagine that if that person were to touch a power tool that had been sprinkled with Holy Water, it would literally burn their fingers.

I am that person.

Honestly, I believe that I’m the “Anti-Bob Vila”! I’m sweet, kind, intelligent and maybe even eloquent at times but I can destroy a home faster than a wrecking ball!

Act Two: “I’ll Just Test It.”


Before tackling the bookshelf color question, I went out to the garage. Innocuously, all I did was pick up just one can of the white stain that I had bought. I shoooook it up real good! Really! or so I thought. “I’ll just test it.” I thought to myself. Then I set the can on the edge of my fireplace and dipped a brush into the stain. Picked out a small section on the wall and dabbed on some stain.

Nothing.

It was like there was no color to it at all! Which was strange because the stain was obviously white when I dipped my brush into it. Soooo… I dipped my brush in again and I spread more on in a bigger area. Like covering more area would make a difference.

Still, nothing!

Narrowing my eyes, I set my jaw and the wheels begin turning inside my head. I hammer the lid back on the can. I SHAKE that bad boy for all I’m worth!

I open up the lid, dip my brush again and still,

NOTHING!!

My left eye begins to twitch.

Knowing at least a little better, I go out on the patio so I don’t spill white stain all over the floor, dinning room table or on the rug. I diiiiiip deeply! Ahhhhh Haaaa, there is all the pigment. I dip and stir, dip and stir, dip and stir; then I take one last deeeeep dip.

I go back into the house, spread liberally then involuntarily yell, “OH SHIT!!!!!”

Now I can’t see any Wood Grain! It’s SOLID WHITE! I frantically begin to spread the stain, using the brush to puuuuullll the stain away, covering yet more and more of the wood as I try like heck to thin this out!!! Spreading for all I’m worth to try to get down to some wood grain.

“THIS ISN’T WORKIIIIIIINNNNG!” echoes repeatedly around my befuddled brain.

Quickly, I run out to the garage, grab a second can of the stain that hasn’t been all shook up. I quick open it. I then dip my paintbrush in the unstirred stain. Hoping that as I spread this thinned stain over the solid white pigment I can the pullll the solid white across the wood that hasn’t been touched by my Evil brush strokes. My logic is by evening out the solid white, I’ll be able to see wood grain again. The ‘test area’ grows exponentially now.

I step back to survey what I had wrought. I slump and involuntarily find myself saying (in my best Forest Gump voice), “Sometimes there just isn’t enough unstirred stain.”

By this time though, my confusion, my complete lack of experience and finally the whole series of missteps hits me and I’m laughing myself silly. It is jiggling my paintbrush; stain and solid pigment alternately dribble all over the floor in front of the test section. Which only makes me laugh more!

Believe it or not, not a single drop lands on my leather loafers. I have absolutely no idea how this is possible. Maybe it’s an indication of how deep my evil extends. I can only destroy what is around me and yet some how I remain protected.

Act Three “RTFM!!!”


Still, working more and more of the wall, nothing is thinning this stuff out. Panicky, I decide to run into the garage and grab a third can. Why grab a third can!? This I learned from my computer experience. When all else fails, Read The Fucking Manual. That’s why! Or in the words of doMESStic bliss, to finally read the Gawd Damn directions!!!

That still doesn’t explain why I have to grab a can out of the garage; there are two cans on the fireplace, right? At least I have retained at least enough awareness to realize that in my current state of near total hilarity and desperation (it’s actually kind of a fun state, you should try it some time) that if I pick up either of the cans on the fireplace I’ll undoubtedly somehow end up dumping the entire contents on the floor as I try to read the directions!! Neither lids is on tight. Undoubtedly what I find in the directions will probably make me go limp and drop the can.

So, I run into the garage yet a third time. Grabbing the can I run back into the house while SPEED-reading the directions. It was like being interrogated by the Home and Garden Channel Police. The spotlight bears down one me unrelenting. I feel the heat; it causes me to sweat clammily as I hold the can.

The Home & Garden Police: “Mr. McCormick, did you stir the contents thoroughly?”

Me: Muttering under my breath, “Yes, I did. Well, finally that is.”

The Home & Garden Police: “Did you bother to use a synthetic brush?”

Me: Answering angrily, “Yes, I did that right!”

The Home & Garden Police: “Did you only apply to a small section no more than two feet by a few feet square?”

Me: Exasperated, “YES! Well, originally it was! I mean.” I start again, “Well, at first is was no larger than couple feet square!” My voice trails off, “It just kinda got out of hand after that.”

The Home & Garden Police (tauntingly): “And did you let the small section dry no more than THREE minutes before wiping off excess with cloth dampened slightly with a small amount of stain?”

Me: Finally Breaking, “HOLY SHIT!!” (It had been at least 10 minutes since the first brush stroke.)

Me: RUNNING TO KITCHEN, RIIIIIIPING OFF A TON OF PAPER TOWELS.

Me: RUNNING BACK TO THE FIREPLACE, NERVOUSLY DIPPING PAPER TOWELS INTO AN ALREADY OPEN CAN OF STAIN!

Me: QUICKLY, FRANTICALLY, WIPING THE WALL LIKE HELL.

Me: LAUGHING MY ASS OFF as I bend all the way upside down to reach the bottom of the wall, while running back and forth between kitchen (for more paper towels) and the fireplace (to lightly moistening paper towels in the stain) and once again WIPING THE WALL LIKE CRAZY!

Me: Repeating the above paragraph at least three times.

The Home & Garden Police (smugly): Watching me the whole time, knowing they’ve got their man and reaching for the phone to call Buffy.

Epilogue:


I finally give up. I understand my fate, my miserable lot in life. There can be no other explanation for this. I AM THE ANTI-BOB VILA! Save yourself. If I were you, I’d move to a different hemisphere.

The only thing that can save me from this state is if Apple will finally release a whole new compliment of digital hub products. See, I understand drag and drop. I understand cut and paste and WYSIWYG. Heck, I’m even getting really good at the command line. Seriously, wouldn’t it be great? Just think of the whole new line of iHome iMprovment products there’d be; Final Roof Pro, AppleHandiWorks, of course my favorite, iWalls (with a choice of file formats, iStain and iPaint). Apple could even release another line of digital hub products for the automotively challenged beginning with iTuneup.

But if Apple fails to become the true digital hub of our homes, there is no hope. One of these days my house will end up a steaming/smoking pile of rubble with me standing in the middle of it holding only a can of wood stain in one hand and a paint brush in the other with the apocalypse shooting out of the end. Surrounded by all the trucks, firemen and equipment from Fire Station #4 backing up Buffy.

Oh! Oh how I wish Apple made home iMprovement products.


Bob McCormick

 

It doesn

On January 19, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bruce Black

Nope, It doesn’t surprise me at all.

As I have mentioned in some previous columns, I like to bike ride. I don’t race at all, save for a brief flirtation with low-level, “category 5″ racing in the mid-80′s. I ride for the physical enjoyment, the exercise, all the usual “feel-good” reasons. I’ve been doing it for some time, I guess, having gotten my first “ten speed” as a teenager. ( And Parent units; Bikes don’t have ten speeds any more. It’s an old term and you give yourself away when you use it, so please stop using it. ) I’ll digress for a moment, and mention that for a long time, say the 1890′s, until approximately the 1930′s, indoor track bicycle racing was more popular in this country than baseball or football are today. It’s hard to imagine people packing into New York’s Madison Square Garden, not to watch the New York Knicks (whoever they are.), but to watch powerful, skilled athletes race fixed-gear bicycles around a banked track at blinding speed. And none of them used steroids! Imagine that.

But, there’s another reason I ride: I like to observe things. Lots of things. Things about our society, things about life in general. Oh yeah, during the warm summer months, I like to observe attractive women. I do not apologize for being in good health. Anyway, over the past twenty-plus years, I have observed a lot of things from my bicycle saddle. And I’m able to do this unobtrusively, since bicyclists tend to blend into the background. (Admit it, you see us, but you don’t really “see us” do you?) I’ve ridden through urban housing projects, where drug dealing is done right out in the open, and no effort made to hide it. And I’ve ridden through some of the most exclusive suburbs west of the city of Boston. On one occasion, I rode right into a “Gated Community”, right past a security guard, who smiled and waved as I rode past. Amusing, because for all he knew, I could have been the “psycho of the week”, there to cut up all the nice rich people with a big bread knife. I rode around for a bit, taking in the swimming pools, tennis courts ( Boy, those people play a lot of tennis, it would seem.) and enormous, landscaped lawns. I am guessing that the bill for landscaping one of those lawns is surely more than I earn in two years. Oh yes, almost every driveway had at least one pricey SUV parked in it. I’m talking Range Rovers, Land Cruisers, and the Mercedes Benz models. One driveway had a Hummer parked in it. I’ll bet that really turns heads at the country club. Sigh… I rode out again, in time to catch the guard, who was now sitting inside his little booth, looking very bored. I didn’t catch whether he was armed or not. I understand that many of these gated communities have armed guards after dark. Lovely, considering that the typical private security guard would, in all likelihood, shoot himself in the foot.

Of the things I have seen, some have been hilarious, and some, well, nasty. One time, I had just ridden past Inman square in Cambridge. I stopped for a red light, as any real cyclist should. From somewhere behind, I heard several loud, hard-on-the-eardrums, cracks. Gunfire. Someone apparently felt the need to express himself by robbing a convenience store, and had fired several rounds. So, that was scary. Needless to say, I vacated the area pronto, and it was some time before I rode through Inman square again. Another “nasty”: On a hazy Sunday afternoon, the Massachusetts State Police were in the process of removing a dead body from the charles river, right near the Hatch memorial band shell. ( That’s the place where they have those great concerts on the Fourth of July.) As it turned out, the body was that of a known homeless man, but that was as much as anyone knew.

Perhaps the nastiest thing I have seen in recent memory, was an automobile on fire, fully engulfed by flames. This was right near the Alewife MBTA (Boston’s mass transit system) station. I had been riding the local roadways for the better part of the afternoon, and saw the black smoke, rising from a short distance. I approached, and joined several other cyclists and rollerbladers, to watch this rather unusual spectacle. People were being kept at a safe distance by police, and that was a good thing. Let me say that to see a car on fire, in person, is very different from seeing it on tv, or in the movies. the “KA-WHAP” sound, made when each of the four tires blew, made people jump back several more feet. I later found out from a bike patrolling Cambridge police officer that the car, a late model Ford Mustang, had been stolen from the Alewife station, and that the thieves, apparently not “pro’s”, had fudged up the electrical system of the car, causing the fire. Sadly, the thieves didn’t burn up with it. Oh well, guess you can’t have everything.

I’ve seen plenty of good, funny things as well. Among these, is a young woman who does a “Robot Mime” performance in Harvard Square. She does the robot moves perfectly, and some people are convinced she is some sort of mannequin, since she can stand motionless, for considerably long periods of time.
Nope, I’ve seen her stop for a break, and she’s quite real. Last time I checked, store mannequins didn’t eat pizza. But how does she do those moves? Heh, some things you see around Harvard Square are worthy of a David Lynch movie. ( He’s never around when I need him! ) There’s the guy who wears a “sandwich board” which always has some sort of religious message on it. (“The Rapture is coming! Are you Ready?”). I’ve been tempted to stop and tell him that I just saw Jesus, and he’s heading this way. No, I thought better of that idea. ( Read, I chickened out.) And there was the woman who hung out anywhere on Mass Ave, between Central Square and Harvard Square, and was always doing a very bad rendition of “God Bless America”. I use past tense here, since I have not seen her in over a year. Oh yes, there is the area known as “The Pit”. Heh, when they rebuilt Harvard Square more than ten years ago, they wanted to design the subway entrance to have “aesthetic appeal”. So, the area around the subway entrance is “sunk” several feet, and lined with benches. Well, it instantly became the place for the local “punks” with their leather outfits, spiked purple hair, and chain jewelry, to hang out. A few kids, some runaways, and some trying to escape the oppression of affluent white suburban life, have made the pit a “home away from home”. For the most part, it’s part of the show, but I’d avoid it after 9 PM. And oh yes, there’s the occasional protest. Guess some people just can’t let the sixties attitude die with dignity. One group was demanding an investigation into who really killed Kurt Cobain. Hoo-boy. It’s amusing, knowing that some of these kids are participating in behavior which will someday keep them off the Supreme Court. Oh well. And some things I have seen are just funny because, well, they just are. An example of this would be the endless line of vehicles, waiting to gain entrance to Walden Pond Beach on a hot summer day. It stretches, sometimes for more than a mile on route 126. From a bike, you can see that there are no smiling faces behind the wheels of the various vehicles. I have often wondered how many divorce proceedings begin right there, in those lines of cars and pricey SUV’s. What’s even more amusing, are the ones who try to “beat the system”, by parking in an illegal spot, and sneaking into the swimming area through the woods. This never works, but they keep trying. ( Word to the unwise: Soccer moms, unless you are a serious cyclist, avoid wearing spandex shorts, okay? )

So, what’s my point of all this? Well, it occurred to me the other day, that nothing seems to surprise me any more. I used to keep a mental inventory of everything I had seen on a particular ride, but now, a lot of things just go right past me. Is this a “good thing”, or a “Bad thing”? Well, that’s a tough one to speculate. There is one thing I have seen that did surprise me however: They put Christmas Decorations up, over Mass Ave. in Cambridge! Horror of horrors! This is Cambridge after all, the center of “Uber Liberalism” in the northeast. Surely, someone could manage to tie Christmas decorations in with the “imperialistic, white-male policies of the Bush administration”, or something like that. After all, in the lily-white town of Lexington, a very concerned group of citizens managed to put a stop to the town’s nativity scene, which had been a holiday fixture on the town common for more than eighty years. ( Yeah, that’ll show Ôem! ) Perhaps a demonstration needs to be arranged, to protest Christmas decorations in Cambridge. It wouldn’t surprise me.


Bruce Black

 

Expo Wrap Up: Sunset in San Francisco

On January 16, 2002, in Uncategorized, by David K Schultz

(c) 01-16-02
David Schultz

As my wife and I sat there on Pacifica
State beach, to catch my very first Pacific Ocean
sunset, I couldn’t help but think the experience seemed
to encapsulate the whole MWSF Expo for me. The truth
dawned on me as the sun slowly hid itself behind the
horizon, sinking into the Ocean: “The Sun had set
on many things this week,” I thought, “especially
in the Macintosh Community.”

The Keynote – Remembrance of Things Past

It all started in the keynote. We were
in the press line at 7AM, and already there were many
there. We hooked up with the MacAddict guys. Nice
bunch. Of course the big talk was Time magazine giving
away Steve’s secret. But that talk soon stopped as
the security people at the top of the stairs began
the countdown to the mad rush into the hall. And so
we all charged…

Steve was at his best. He spoke in sentences
like Hemmingway wrote prose – in short and punctuated
verbal hits. "You wanted a G4. We said yes. You
wanted SuperDrive. We said yes."

The keynote was poignant in several
respects. As Steve showed off iDVD and iPhoto capturing
the birthday party of someone’s daughter, and other
family matters, he turned to us and said, “This
is why we do what we do
.” I later asked someone
from Apple “What did the “this” refer to when Steve
said “This is why we do what we do”?” He paused for
a moment, looking for words in his mind, and said
something about loved ones and heartfelt relationships.
“Interesting,” I replied, “I thought he was referring
to the memory of these things, not the things themselves.”

The point is of course that your daughter
has only one 3rd birthday, and once it’s over it’s
gone forever and memory is the only thing you have.
A first in your life can only come once, and then
it’s gone forever, the rest being mere memorial seconds.

Why do we do what we do then? Was Steve
pointing to the girl on the screen and the photo print
he made from iPhoto? No. He was talking about the
fleeting, vaporous nature of our existence, and our
desperate, and at times feeble, attempts to capture
it and make it solid in some way. Our daughters and
loved ones mean so much to us because each minute
that passes is not only one more minute we
had with them, but also one less minute that
he had with them as well. Things are meaningful to
us because we understand that we are losing them with
each passing instant. After all, even Homer has Zeus
say in The Iliad, “I love them [mortals] because
they die.”

… think about it.

This is why we desire iPhoto. One person
said to me that he is going to capture his anniversary
with his wife and have it printed in a book. Hey,
you only have ONE tenth wedding anniversary, don’t
you? Might as well try and make it solid by printing
some momentary sensory images, call them “photos”
and printing them out, right?

Lost Memory

Just before the Expo, New Year’s Eve
morning in fact, I lost my best friend of fifteen
years, Dr. Erwin Schrodinger. Dr. Schrodinger was
thrown out of his litter when he was small (seems
mom didn’t want him), and it made him very dependent
on me; he would rarely let me out of his sight for
some kind of abandonment anxiety, maybe. Even after
I got married Schrodinger was still “daddy’s kitty.”
If I would get up and walk across the room, he followed
me, making sure I wasn’t leaving for too long. It
was the best $10 I EVER spent.

Schrodinger
tolerating his new friend, "Xaney"
just weeks prior to his passing away.

Xaney
has taken over Schrodinger’s duties and is quickly
working her way into our hearts.

I loved Dr. Schrodinger. We went through college,
graduate school, marriage, three national championships,
four houses and two towns together. But he was ill,
and he was in pain. When he fell in his litter box
because he suddenly couldn’t lift his hip, he looked
up at me, laying in his box, as if to ask for help
out of his litter box and into some dignity. I picked
him up and placed him on couch, making sure every
need was met.

On Saturday before New Year’s Eve he
slipped out of it and lay motionless on the floor,
barely breathing. He would move his eyes, and at times
he would seem to come to and reach out with his paw
and grab my hand, letting out a sad little “meow.”
We had a vigil the whole week end, hoping he’d pass
quietly at home. I laid there on the floor, with him
wrapped in a blanket, all week end, assuring him of
my presence. Every once in a while he would come to,
look and make contact with me, and then seem to sink
again, with the comfort that I was there by him and
he knew I would do what had to be done.

It wasn’t to be. Monday, New Year’s Eve, we drove
to the vet early in the morning, after making sure
he did the one thing he loved to do for the last time,
namely, spending a night sleeping with his best friend,
me, in the big bed. The vet came in and administered
the barbiturate concoction. My dear Dr. Schrodinger
reached out toward us one last time as the needle
went in, took a deep breath, and it was over.

It was hard on me. I was devastated.
It was so quick. But after all, we had a long-standing
agreement that he would die of old-age and never of
want. So he died like he lived, with dignity, and
with me by his side. I miss him.

His image in my mind is fleeting and
its vividness is vanishing quickly. I recall the last
week end we had with him, how I sat there and looked
at him trying my hardest to, as it seemed, take a
photograph in my mind, to burn a memory into my brain
so deeply that nothing could erase it. I focused on
every detail so that I could remember everything about
him, for I knew that in two days he’d be gone. But
I couldn’t. He was slipping away in my hands and in
my mind. We took no pictures of my sick friend; those
aren’t the memories we wanted to preserve. I took
one last look as they wrapped his limp body in a towel
and took in away, after we had a few minutes with
him. Soon after, I began to forget.

The first thing I did when I came home,
and was alone, was to search the house for pictures
of him. I found some, gathered them, sat down on the
couch, and consciously began the mourning process,
tears falling over the captured impressions which
now represented the only thing I had left of my dear
friend – printed, objectified memories. I miss my
kitty and I am sad. That fifteen years was gone in
a second. I hang on to them tightly. I thrust and
push myself into the past, wanting to recapture moments
and days, trying to touch and feel my lost friend.
But memories make no sound, they don’t stink up the
house on occasion, they don’t feel furry, they are
not fat or thin, and they can’t reach out to me and
follow me everywhere as he always did. They are just,
as Plato would say, faint copies of originals, and
now the original is gone and I miss him, while the
copies become fainter and fainter.

This is why we do what we do. iDVD,
iMovie and iPhoto are testaments not only to innovation
but to the fragility and fleeting nature of our lives.
We don’t want to forget; we want to remember, and
all because we know the events captured will never,
ever present themselves to us again. They are gone
forever.

It was entirely appropriate that Steve
recapped the memories of the iMac with a look back
at old commercials to see how the iMac grew up, as
were, the same way that we looked back on that girl’s
birthday just moments before. It was twilight, the
twilight of the iMac as we know it, and we were all
saying good bye and ushering in a new era of Apple
computer. There was a strange isomorphism between
the demos of iDVD and iPhoto, and rerunning the old
commercials of the iMac. It was almost as if Steve
was trying to say the iMac was his child and he wanted
to share some memories with us (its high points and
milestones), the same way one might want to share
memories of his daughter’s 3rd birthday with iDVD,
iMovie or iPhoto. It just all seemed so connected
to me. Everything was passing away. Twilight had arrived.

“It’s Time”

That’s right Steve, “It’s time.” And
that’s the problem, isn’t it. That’s what makes our
world so fragile. Is it me, or do we seem to spend
our whole lives saying good bye to loved ones? And
as one writer here told me "Days are long. Years
are short." Indeed.

Well, it’s time to say good bye not
only to the iMac but to the old Mac OS. As one Apple
employee I met with said, “The train has left the
station. The old OS will soon be a faint memory.”
Yes it has and yes it will. And it ain’t coming back,
just like time itself – it’s marching on.

There was Steve explaining that he
is moving up the pre-install of OS X on new machines
from March to, well… now. A clock. He uses a clock
as a metaphor for OS X’s growth and development. The
very thing that memory depends on. The clock is ticking,
my friends. It’s time to get on board.

What was Steve saying when he said
“It’s time”? To whom was he speaking? Clearly, he
was speaking to developers like Adobe and Macromedia
(who wasn’t even at the Expo), and others who should
have some builds of their premiere programs, Photoshop
and Dreamweaver, out by now. Steve even joked that
he could have Photoshop as his default app in iPhoto,
if it were out, that is! “What are you waiting for?
What’s taking so long people? We’re moving ahead.
Move it or lose it.” That was the message.

Frankly,
I am tired of all the Photoshop complainers out there.
They speak as though, somehow, as if by magic, a wave
of the wand, a downright miracle will happen when Photoshop
is released, namely, that OS X will be a real OS after
that. Absolute and utter nonsense. There are
programs that do what Photoshop can do for OS X

(we will be introducing them to you in reviews soon,
one of our favorites if TIFFany [see link above]). OS
X will be the very same OS it was before Photoshop is
introduced and after. Not a thing will change. And of
course there is the obvious distinction between an app
and an OS, which some amazingly ignore (one person actually
wrote that Photoshop is "missing from OS X"!!
Nonsense I tells ya.

No, it is the tyranny of a minority
that have the power to speak louder than others because
they have the web sites and technology. 90% could
care less about Photoshop and could use it full-time
right now and not miss a step. It is in a word elitist
and would make even John Stuart Mill roll in his grave.
Just because those who have the web sites and the
columns use Photoshop and endlessly complain about
it, it does not follow that OS X is not adoptable
RIGHT NOW by most everyone (hardware issues and finances
aside). It’s time… to stop complaining and start
using OS X.

"The train has left the station."
Darn tootin’!

This change (another temporal concept,
by the way), will have repercussions throughout the
industry and we will, I assure you, see it change
the Mac Web. Sites that refuse to hop on board will
lose readers. If the old Mac hippies keep hanging
on to the old OS they will be trampled by the new
kids on the block as they storm into the future. At
some point one has to stop complaining and start using
OS X because, simply put, it’s time. It is a beautiful,
powerful and wonderful OS, and will soon be the major
competitor to Windows in business. The open source
community is coming to apple’s aid. It’s going to
happen very quickly. The Unix core is a stroke of
genius because the material is already in place.

It’s time.

There is a thin line between having
a low end machine and an obsolete machine. And that
line will become clearer very quickly. In the blink
of an eye we will suddenly see that OS X is the default
system, that we are using it all the time, it will
be assumed that you’re using it, that all our
programs are carbonized, and that any task we want
to accomplish can be accomplished right now in OS
X. Whether a machine is low end or obsolete will no
longer be measured by its color or form factor, but
by its OS, and the support of the same, and that time
is coming quickly. The train has left the station
and it’s headed right for us.

It will be seen in reviews
soon. We have talked at Applelust about whether to downgrade
a review because it isn’t ported to OS X. Well, we really
can’t knock a product because of a nonexistent version,
can we? That’s not fair at all. But
the time is coming, and coming quickly, when NOT having
an OS X version will count in our review ratings, and
count in a negative way
. That is, the time is
quickly coming when we will say “It would have four
bounces and not three if they had an OS X version.”
Up until 10.1.1 it wasn’t an issue really. Now, well,
as Steve said, “it’s time.” So at Applelust we have
made a decision: No product can get a perfect score
unless it has OS X drivers, is an OS X version, or has
OS X option, or whatever. We don’t care about the cost,
frankly. We just want those apps because “it’s time.”
So a quick word to developers – “If you want a high
rating here, anyway, you gotta give us carbon at least.”
In fact, other than reviews which are in progress, we
now plan to review OS X versions only.

It’s time.

The simple fact is that we are watching
a twilight, an ending, a death in the family, if you
will. What was this whole Expo about? Memories. The
memory of the old iMac; the memory of a daughter’s
birthday; the memories captured in iPhoto or iDVD;
the memories of the old OS. As we sat there in Pacifica
and watched the sun slowly sink into the Pacific,
I saw the old iMac, Classic, and my kitty, say good
bye.

It’s time.

Now a sunset is only
a prelude to a sunrise. Saying good bye to the old
iMac was a way to "Say Hello Again" to
the new iMac; saying good bye to the old OS was
a way of saying hello to the new one. But despite
our best efforts those sunsets and sun rises just
keep going and going, representing change and the
passage of time, reminding us that after a while
our memories are our lives and all we have left.
iPhoto, iDVD, and iMovie are just mere ways to capture
and preserve what is no longer real (namely the
past, which does not "exist" at all).
They have worth to us because our lives keep marching
forward toward our own, personal sunsets at which
we cross the bounds of the unknown, and we become
a mere memory too, in others’ minds. And this makes
each sun rise worthwhile — if we pay attention.
We do what we do because our children only have
one 3rd birthday, because there will always be that
one special pet, and because both of them at some
point will cease to exist except for a memory. It’s
sad and uplifting at the same time.

In one scene in "Hannibal"
Anthony Hopkins, as Hannibal the cannibal, is caught
on tape waving his hand. His one-time victim asks
his doctor, "Is that a wave good bye, or hello?"
You might also ask the same thing about the photos
in this essay, "Is that a sunrise or sunset?"
Only the order of the pictures gives it away, and
in a way it doesn’t matter – sunsets look like sunrises,
most of the time. We wave hello to a new day and
good bye to an old one. But in the end, East meets
meets West.

We said good bye to many
things in this Expo, but the hand waves soon turned
to greeting gestures for the new iMac, a new OS,
and the sun is rising again on a new Apple.

Seize the day…

 

Geri

On January 14, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bob McCormick

How Apple is following Pixar’s blueprint of success

Some of us may still be wondering when Apple will break out of its niche market and gain a bit more market share. It isn’t that Apple has to turn the tables on Microsoft’s 95% of the computer market. I’d just like it if I could pull out my PowerBook and not have two thirds of the people at the table point, laugh and ask, “Do they still make Macs?” I’d like it if Apple could send out the press release that Citigroup or maybe General Motors is replacing all of their corporate computers with Macs. Something that would make the PC world sit-up and take notice that the Macintosh is a serious business platform.

The problem is that with only five percent of the market (approximately 3 percent worldwide), Apple is simply too easy a target for industry experts, the media and Wall Street to take pot shots at whenever they want. It would seem that ‘nobody ever got fired for predicting Apple’s demise’ in the last ten years or so.

I know different and you know different. If you’ve used OS X 10.1 lately you definitely know different, especially if you hooked up to an NT domain. It’s so easy to integrate a Mac on a network these days it took my breath away! After that experience, I thought it would only be a matter of time before a Fortune 500 company stepped up to the bat and made the switch to Macintoshes. That was, until I read the latest “I, Cringely” article at PBS.

If you want to give yourself a bit of a scare, go read the column, “The Best Revenge: Why the New iMacs Will Be Successful No Matter What They Look Like.” http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020110.html Don’t be fooled by the title, this column is not really about the new iMac. It’s about how Apple “won’t be enough to ‘win.’” Honestly, it gave me a chill. Read it, you’ll see what I mean. It made me think that maybe Apple and the Mac OS just might always be second class citizens, never be taken seriously ever and simply never escape the “niche’ market” albatross it wears around its neck.

It was so depressing a read that afterwards I went surfing on the web for something to cheer me up. I finally sought refuge on Pixar.com (Steve Jobs other company). They have their short films and movie ‘outages’ in QuickTime format. I decided I needed a laugh. After viewing the out takes from “A Bug’s Life” (verrrry funny), I decided to poke around Pixar’s immensely improved web site. Found a wonderful section on the company’s history. They have achieved some absolutely amazing success. Pixar was once just a small computer graphics division of Lucas Films. Back in 1986 Steve Jobs bought the division from Lucas Films and Pixar was born.

Luxo Jr. was their first release. It was the very first all-computer generated animated short film. Ironically, I remember seeing it on the big screen at a Short Film Festival. It was hilarious. I didn’t even use Macs back then, let alone computers but I still remember that film.

Flash forward almost 10 years later and you find yourself smack dab in the middle of a hugely successful film from Pixar called, “Toy Story.” Once again, Pixar makes history by being the very first to produce a feature length film that is completely computer animated and not just that, it also happens to be a box office smash.

Which got me to thinking back to the “I, Cringley” column. Steve knows how to win. In fact, Steve Jobs knows how to win BIG. Pixar now has made three of the top seven highest grossing animated films of all time! A number that will probably grow to four, with the recent release of Monster’s Inc. Don’t tell me Steve Jobs doesn’t know how to make Apple win.

Looking at what Pixar did to become such a huge success in just 10 years and to sustain that success is like a blue print for what Apple has been doing since Steve Jobs returned to the company as iCEO in 1997.

How did Pixar do it? By focusing entirely on being and doing the best they can, every time out. Each time they released a short film it pushed their story telling as well as their technology forward. They didn’t care that they suffered in virtual anonymity making short films and commercials. (Remember the conga line of LifeSavers candies?) In doing that, they did however garner a number of very critical awards and gained a reputation for quality and excellence.

Ironically, Pixar, like Apple, makes the entire widget! From developing the story to their 3D software Renderman, to writing and directing the movies. Starting out small, they made their short films and commercials all the while, improving their software, their skills and story telling. Then, they made a strategic partnership with Disney to co-create full length feature films and a “Toy Story” was born. Suddenly everything was different. It took about 10 years to do it but Pixar was a huge success.

That’s when it hit me. Is Apple playing Pixar to Microsoft’s Disney? That’s when I knew my original chill of fear was wrong. Apple is simply following Pixar’s blueprint for success.

Look at what Apple is doing and compare it to what Pixar has done. First things first, concentrate on what you to best. Steve Jobs dumps all the peripheral stuff (both literally and figuratively). Granted, Apple was an existing company when Steve came back but by dumping all that “stuff” Apple was able to truly focus on what they did best.

Apple then signs a deal with Microsoft to make sure that they keep producing Microsoft Office and to bury the hatchet on their legal differences. Once again, clearing the way for Apple to focus on what they did best. Then Apple releases the iMac, it’s a huge hit that saves the company. It’s no “Toy Story” but it gives them room to just keep making the best damn computers and software that they can. Additionally, they keep coming up with the best damn innovations that they can, FireWire, making QT the basis for MPEG 4, Airport, finally popularizing USB and probably more that we’ve yet to see.

They aren’t just pushing their computers and software ahead but also technology in general. Like Pixar, Apple has been gathering up awards and making their technology standard in the industry. Heck, Apple even went so far as to follow Pixar to the Academy Awards and win! Apple just recently won for FireWire.

Apple’s “Toy Story” isn’t going to happen over night. It took Pixar nearly 10 years to achieve their current success. Apple’s “Toy Story” is coming but don’t expect Apple to one day have 95% of the market. Pixar isn’t the most powerful movie studio in the world but they certainly aren’t a niche player making Listerine commercials anymore either.

The way I see it, Steve Jobs knows how to win and I suspect that given time, he will indeed increase Apple’s market share. Apple will finally break out of this notion that they are a boutique computer maker or the “BMW/Volvo” of the computer industry. It won’t be world domination but certainly enough market share, unique features and the best quality out there that it will finally silence all of the naysayers, PC Weenies and the industry experts that predict Apple’s demise year after year.

Honestly, I believe Apple will win. Maybe not quite as convincingly as in Pixar’s short “Geri’s Game” but certainly Apple will win.


Bob McCormick

 

Cool Blogs Links

On January 13, 2002, in Macintosh, by MyMac Administrator

Cool Blogs

MacNightOwl
The website of Mac author Gene Steinberg, he posts almost daily on everything Macintosh (and technology) related. A good read.

Continue reading »

 

Review – Astra 4000U Scanner

On January 9, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Chris Seibold

Astra 4000U
Company: Umax

http://www.umax.com
Price: $249.00

I am an aspiring cartoonist. A few times every year I send some drawings off to the major syndicates and get soundly rejected. It’s a lesson in humility that I count as a character building experience. Still, there is a less rational part of my psyche that insists my stuff is, in fact, good enough. This part insists my toons just need to be presented a little better.

Since I have a persistent fantasy (hey, maybe myMac could use a cartoon or two?) I’m always looking for a way to get a little bit better. I reasoned that if I could scan a complete cartoon into the computer and clean it up with an image-editing program I would be that much closer to my goal of working at home. The rub was (note past tense) that I draw on legal paper and most scanners are letter sized. I had looked around for a legal sized scanner and found them to be a bit on the pricey side. Apparently a legal sized scanner is equivalent to a round trip ticket without a weekend stay: They assume it’s for business and charge accordingly.

At least that what’s I thought until I ran across the UMAX Astra 4000U. At less than 200 dollars it was in my price range. Hmmm, thought I, this will put me over the hump. So I bit the bullet and placed the order. A few days later I had the goods, much to the chagrin of my wife who rightfully regards such expenditures as a waste of money.

Installation was easy, the thing is USB so it’s a simple matter of plugging it in. I would say plug and play but for me it was mostly plug and wait. The problem wasn’t with the hardware; the problem was with the software. Sure UMAX sent a whole bunch of software with the scanner, but I wouldn’t know cause my CD was bad. I tried it in my factory-installed drive. I tried it in my Iomega CD rewritable drive. No luck. So it was off to the internet to download the necessary software. Perusing the UMAX site I noted they would send me a replacement CD… for a fee. I opted for the twenty and a half megabyte download. It’s a fairly large file, it would probably take a minute or so on a cable modem but I have a 56k modem. I started the download and went to bed (I pay for unlimited usage for a reason).

The following morning might as well have been Christmas as far as I was concerned (and was after my wife saw the bill). I had a shiny downloaded installer. It worked seamlessly as did the scanner. Or at least I think it did. Here we are going to have to enter the shadowy area of personal opinion. I remember those Macworld articles about scanner resolution and color fidelity, tests timed with a stopwatch (53 seconds for a legal sized scan, but I counted one Mississippi, two Mississippi) and head to head comparisons. I did not do any of these. I scanned a cartoon in, manipulated it a bit, printed it out and thought, “That should get me a nicer rejection letter than usual”. The scan seemed pretty faithful to the original, which is a problem if you’re not a very good artist, but nice if you’re after accurate scans. What I’m trying to say, and fumbling with, is that the UMAX gave quite a lovely scan. I tried it in color (scanned some postage stamps, hey you save money where you can) and I was amazed by the output.

I don’t think that quality is unique to UMAX yet it was considerably better than my Agfa. I suspect scanner technology has advanced in the last year to the point where last years best consumer scans are this years average scans. Heck Apple crammed a movie studio that would’ve cost more than my house and the five nearest neighbor’s abodes ten years ago into a three grand box, so it shouldn’t be much of a surprise. Think of it this way, when you were a kid you thought the effects of the original Star Wars were pretty darn realistic. In comparison to one of the latest digitized monster movies someone might as well have been running around with a blue shirt holding a x-wing model and making mouth noises. Point being what we call “acceptable” or “average” today was called groundbreaking a few years or months ago.

So let’s recap: The Astra 4000U is a nice cheap scanner if you do regular (albeit oversized) stuff. I wouldn’t recommend it if you’re trying to digitize five years worth of legal documents but if you’re one of the folks who scans an occasional image (one or two per day) that is a bit bigger than letter size I’d say this scanner would be an ideal choice. The color depth and speed is probably not something a professional would put up with but if you’re emailing Aunt Millie the ASTRA is more than adequate.

I can’t recommend the ASTRA under any circumstances if you’re the “average” scanner user. The average scanner user uses the scanner once or twice and never touches the thing again. The ASTRA would be a terrible choice if this describes you. The ASTRA footprint is, predictably, a bit larger than a standard scanner. So if it’s basically a desk ornament, save the space and get a smaller model.

Which leaves me on this note, I have a scanner AGFA esscan 20 that needs a home. It’s a nice scanner. I did all the cartoons on www.sealclubbing.com/cindex.html with it. It’s not for sale, it’s not a collectors item, but it is free for the price of shipping. Drop me a note, first check wins.


Chris Seibold

 

The Nemo Memo: CDRW Media

On January 9, 2002, in Uncategorized, by John Nemerovski

Which blank CD media should you use with your new 24x CD-RW burner?

I just came back from an exploratory shopping expedition to Sam’s Club. (Sam’s web site doesn’t reflect what I found at the physical warehouse store.)

CD-R

Doing a comparison pricing of CD-R blank disks was easy at Sam’s because only one brand is carried. Verbatim has a vast empire of recordable media, with inventory listed in profusion on their web pages.

I had forgotten about the Verbatim brand until three blank CD-R disks arrived with my LaCie 24x review burner. Later that day I purchased some 24x CompUSA brand CD-R’s, which appeared to perform as well as the Verbatims. Several days later David Weeks loaned me a short stack of cheapo 16x Prime Peripherals blanks, giving me a sample of three brands to compare. (Verbatim has subsequently provided several different types of disks to add depth to this evaluation.)

Here’s what I found:

  • 24x CD-R’s consistently burn at their designated speed.
  • 16x CD-R’s can burn at 24x if you are in a real hurry, but you may have occasional duds.
  • Brand name disks are somewhat higher (difficult to quantify) quality than generic brands when transferring and accessing your valuable data, music, and multimedia files.
  • You can save a lot of $$$ by keeping your eyes and ears open for sales, rebates, and promo offers.
  • You can waste a lot of time attempting to locate and purchase bargain blanks.
  • Conventional jewel cases are still the best way to store and protect your precious CDs, but they take more space and use more plastic than the alternatives.
  • Slim packs and stack packs may save you $$$ at first, but beware of their reduced disk safety.

    How Much?

    In the United States, the following retail targets will help you obtain brand name 16x or 24x CD-R blanks in quantity for the lowest possible cost, based on Sam’s Club warehouse pricing:

  • 60¢ and below per disk in standard jewel cases
  • 50¢ and below per disk in slim cases
  • 30¢ and below per disk in spindle stack packs.

    (You often don’t save much $$$ when you purchase blank media in bulk spindle packs, then buy empty jewel or slim cases afterward.)

    Most people tell me they prefer a certain brand name, but they are willing to try different premium or generic brands when CD-R prices are lower and purchase is convenient. Comparison URLs such as http://www.salescircular.com and http://www.ask.com can really help (or drive you crazy) in your search for retail and online bargains. Watch your local Sunday print newspaper ads too.

    For casual music and file archive purposes, cheapo disks are probably fine most of the time, but don’t use them for mission critical work. In this small consumer-use sampling, CompUSA and Verbatim 24x CD-R media appear to record and playback with comparable results. My local Sam’s Club happens to be next door to CompUSA, so I would typically choose Verbatim over CompUSA brand because Sam’s normal warehouse price is much less than next door. (I didn’t have a chance to visit Costco across town, but their prices are usually very close to Sam’s.)

    CD-RW

    Verbatim sent me some CD-RW ÒHigh SpeedÓ 10x disks. You can use them over and over, justifying their higher initial price, and keeping our environment less cluttered with discarded plastic detritus.

    Using ToastLite 5.0.2 and the aforementioned LaCie drive (which — sob — is going back to LaCie next week) I created a WRITE SESSION archive of over 3,000 items, more than 500 MB, in under six minutes at 10x on CD-RW (not bad!), all while running AOL, Internet Explorer, and AppleWorks.

    Verdict: for CD-RW, use the best quality disks and packaging you can find, and they should last for many rewrites.

    Important: store your precious archives in a different physical building than your computer, for extra free insurance from fire, theft, flooding, and gooey pizzas.

    P.S. Roxio’s Toast is a great application! I love it. Roxio has invited me to a special Macworld preview of their new products, so I’ll have more on this software in a few weeks. Keep your browser aimed to MyMac.com, friends.


    John Nemerovski

  •  

    MacRelevant – Is Aqua Great?

    On January 8, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Tim Robertson

    Is Aqua Great?

    There have been quite a few articles written about Aqua, the graphical interface for Mac OS X. For the most part, Macintosh fanatics, those who refuse to see anything bad when it comes to Apple, write these articles. There have been a few very honest articles, those that point out the shortcomings of the interface, such as Andrew Orlowski’s “The Register” column, as well as a good follow up by Charles Moore at AppleLinks.

    Most such articles bemoan the loss of many of the functions from Mac OS 9, and the speed (or lack thereof) of Aqua, even on a fast processor. They cry for spring-loaded folders. (They are coming back.) They piss and moan about the loss of the Application Switcher. Or no window shading. Or that the OS is too “Steve’d”, meaning you can’t change a thing about the look or functionality of the OS, forced to use it as Steve Job has decreed.

    I won’t sit here and tell you those complaints are wrong. But I will sit here and tell you that I am getting sick and tired of people who think that Mac OS X should be as easy to use as the Classic Mac OS. It is not as easy, nor will it be for quite a while.

    Mac OS X is a brand new operating system. Brand new. Started practically from the ground up. Created by arguably the greatest operating system engineering team of all time. A feat equal to the creation of the original Finder. (I know that statement will draw a lot of heat, but I don’t care. I truly believe that Mac OS X is not only an engineering marvel, but also one of the technological marvels of the twenty-first century.) The big difference from the classic OS and OS X, then, is that OS X did not have the benefit of years and years of legacy development to build upon. Mac OS X started from scratch. They started from point A, moved to point B, and pretty much released Mac OS X at point E. For the sake of actually shipping the product, some things took precedence over others, mostly all the new “Gee Whiz” items in the new OS (The “hook” to get people to buy it), as well as getting it to actually work. (And lets not even get into the fact that no one has been really successful at getting Unix to be accepted as a home OS in twenty years until Apple did it.)

    So no, not all the great things that made the Mac OS what it was for the past fifteen years is in OS X. It’s not as fast as the classic OS. It lacks some of the functionality of the original. But like any great product, it has to start somewhere. At right out of the gate, no new OS will have every feature we wish it had.

    My contention about these articles on what is wrong with Mac OS X is simple: they make it sound as if Apple is doing something wrong or is intentionally leaving out features to spite them as users. Neither, in my opinion, is true. Mac OS X is new, and as time goes on, Apple is adding both new features to the OS, as well as bringing some of functionality of the classic OS into the new product.

    Don’t bitch for the sake of bitching is all I am saying. Take Mac OS X for what it is: the most technically advanced computer operating system for home users. But keep in mind that it is a work in progress, as Apple has shown with the constant updates to the system. Correct me if I am wrong, but it seems to me that Apple has released some new update to the system every month or so since the release of version 10.0. In less than a year, the system (as I write this) is already at version 10.1.2, with more and more updates being delivered all the time. (This past week, for instance, there 111.4 MB of downloadable items available via the software update control panel, all of which added new functionality in the way of print drivers to the OS.)

    I have even heard people whining about the need to download updates on such a regular basis. Things to the effect of “why does Apple keep releasing these large updates all the time!” as if that is a bad thing. In other words, Apple should be lambasted for updating the OS, for making it BETTER!

    As an old friend of mine was want to say, “Man, shut the fuck up!”

    Seriously.

    No, OS X is not where OS 9 was a year ago in speed. But compared to where OS X was a year ago, it is light years ahead. And a year from now? Who can say, though my money is on it being at least three times as fast, with five times the functionality?

    So for those who decide to go back to using OS 9, more power to you. Me? Well, I like the stability. I don’t mind an Application taking a few seconds longer to launch. Small price for all the benefits. I also don’t mind the (temporary) loss of some of the functionality of OS 9. I know Apple is working on bring back those features, or even better ones, in the near future. I appreciate all the effort the engineers at Apple spent on bringing this marvel to my desktop. Rather than bitching about things ALL THE DAMN TIME, I would rather THANK for people for their efforts and accomplishments.

    I won’t sit here and bitch and moan about all the little things I miss, like a spoiled brat who did not get everything he wanted for Christmas. No OS is perfect, not even OS X. But it is getting better, almost on a daily basis. And me? I am along for the ride! And what a fun ride it is!

    Yee-Ha!


    Tim Robertson

     

    Byte Me! – Translation Please!

    On January 4, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Ralph J Luciani

    If you have read any of my previous Byte Me! articles you may be aware of my slightly slanted views re: Computers and Operating Systems in particular. With the latest Windows XP and Mac OS X, we have the ongoing push by Microsoft and Apple to collect monies from the faithful. There have been many comparisons on the net about which system is best . My analogy below has to do with the emotional rather than the practical. You may find, however, that practicality may sometimes lead you astray while emotions give a truer sense of reality.

    For this impractical but emotional exercise, let us look at the two operating systems above and how they might tackle the art of translation and meaning of a selection of French terms. May the best OS win.

    Note: A knowledge of French is helpful but not necessary.

    En Francais = Toujours l’amour
    Mac OS X = Love always
    Windows XP = Two days of love

    En Francais = Bonne Chance
    Mac OS X = Good luck
    Windows XP = Bonnie takes a chance

    En Francais = La vie en rose
    Mac OS X = Life through rose coloured glasses
    Windows XP = Rose Avenue

    En Francais = Je t’adore
    Mac OS X = I love you
    Windows XP = Shut the door

    En Francais = Pas de deux
    Mac OS X = Ballet step
    Windows XP = Father of twins

    En Francais = Donnez-moi une baiser?
    Mac OS X = Give me a little kiss, huh?
    Windows XP = Where’s Donny’s Baiser?

    En Francais = Voulez-vous choucher avec moi?
    Mac OS X = Want to fool around?
    Windows XP = Will you help me move the couch?

    En Francais = Avez-vous des faim?
    Mac OS X = Are you hungry?
    Windows XP = Are you famous?

    En Francais = Carte Blanche
    Mac OS X = Anything goes
    Windows XP = Blanche is in the cart again

    En Francais = La femme fatale
    Mac OS X = Dangerous women
    Windows XP = Hold on to your . . .wallet

    En Francais = Menage a trois
    Mac OS X = Three way affair
    Windows XP = I am three years old

    En Francais = Affaire manquee
    Mac OS X = Missed appointment
    Windows XP = Monkey business


    Ralph J. Luciani

     

    La Befana

    On January 3, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Ralph J Luciani

    La Befana vien di notte
    con le scarpe tutte rotte
    col cappello alla romana
    viva viva la Befana!

    More years ago than I care to remember, my mother first told me the story of La Befana. It stayed with me through the years and I retold it to my son when he was a child. La Befana is one of Italy’s oldest and most celebrated legends, a marvelous story about a good Christmas witch. Perhaps the term “witch” may be too strong. I think “fairy” would be more correct. However, because the Befana was old and ugly with a pointed chin and hooked nose I suppose that, by necessity, this made her classification as a witch seem appropriate. Still, she is as much a part of the Christmas spirit in Italy as the German Christmas tree, the English mistletoe or the increasingly popular American Santa Claus who the Italians have dubbed Babbo Natale. Even today, in modern Italy, on twelveth night, the evening between January 5 and 6, she makes her rounds, just as the Magi do. The name Befana is thought to be a derivative of the word Epiphany or Epifania in Italian which is a celebration of the manifestation of the Christ child to the gentiles (the three Magi, in particular, and the world in general.)

    The legend began about the time the Christ child was born. At that time she was already old and bent with arthritis and used a gnarled oak branch as a cane. She lived in a tiny stone cottage on the outskirts of Bethlehem that was more like a large room than a house. She lived alone, as her husband had died years before, and she had no children or family. Her one luxury was the large fireplace in one corner that was as tall as she. It was here that she cooked and sat to keep warm during the cold winter months.

    That winter in the holy land was particularly cold and bitter. The cold aggravated her arthritis and sent shock waves of pain through all her joints. Still, when her supply of branches and twigs was used up she was forced to go back out into the cold and search for more fire wood. The cold wind blew down from the hills above and she pulled her patched shawl tightly about her and hobbled towards the forest in search of more firewood. Despite the breeze, the night was clear and the moonlight bright. It was almost two hours later when she returned with a small bundle of branches. Every bone and joint in her body seemed to complain in unison. She was extremely tired. After adding some of her twigs to the fire, she almost immediately fell asleep in her rickety chair. The Befana was so poor the chair was also her bed.

    The next day, she repeated her search for firewood and this time she returned with two bundles. She bound them with a coarse cord of woven hemp to make it easier for her to carry. Then she looped the cord around her neck so that one bundle hung on each side. She used her shawl to protect her skin and she slowly made her way back to her cottage, balancing the bundles and leaning heavily on her cane. She was overjoyed because with the extra bundle she could barter for food at the market in Bethlehem – which she did. By the time she returned to her cottage, night had fallen. She felt a strange elation that she attributed to her luck in finding the extra firewood. Once more, the night sky was clear and bright and ablaze with stars. One star, in particular, outshone all the rest. She marveled at this strange phenomenon. Just as she reached the door to her cottage, several figures appeared. Their shapes seemed to rise out of the ground as they approached the crest of the hill from the other side. They grew taller and taller, and as they reached the summit, she could see that there were three riders on camels and each had several attendants on foot. They were speaking animatedly but in a tongue she could not understand. As they neared the path to her door, one of the riders called out to her in an accent, thick and foreign sounding. “Can you tell me, grandmother, if the town ahead be Bethlehem?”

    The Befana was intrigued by these strangers who wore clothes of fine silk and were wrapped in thick wool shawls with colourful designs. “It is indeed, honourable sir,” she answered, bowing in reverence to the three riders who by their manner and dress were surely men of dignity and stature. “Forgive my presumption,” she continued, “but if you are here for the census proclamation of Caesar, you will find the town crowded and all accommodations taken. I would ask you to stay with me, but my abode is very small.”

    “Thank you, grandmother, for your kindness but we are from a distant country and are seeking the newborn King of the Jews. We have followed his sign in the night sky and it glows most brightly here above Bethlehem. Have no fear, though, We have come to worship him, not to harm him. Perhaps you have heard this good news and can direct us to him.”

    The Befana was riveted by the news of the newborn king. She thought it was strange she had not heard any gossip at the market that King Herad was to be a new father. “I know nothing of the young king, but I most surely would like to pay homage to the babe. May I accompany you?

    “Of course, grandmother, but you must not dally. Yonder star still moves, and if we lose sight of it, we will also lose our way,” they said.

    “I will be but a moment. Let me gather some food to take on the journey and I will happily join you.” She rushed into her cottage as fast as her aching body would permit and picked what little food she could scrape together. As she was about to leave, she remembered that it would not be proper to visit the child without a gift, however small. She searched every inch of the room but could find nothing. At last, in desperation, she picked up the only item of value she had – her remaining bundle of fire wood. She put it into an old sack, threw it over her shoulder and hobbled out to the caravan of strangers.

    To her dismay, she found that they had departed into the night. Even so, she could hear the occasional bray of their camels in the distance. In a panic, she hurried in the direction of the sound toward the centre of Bethlehem, her silver hair flying in the wind behind her. Above, the sky was still clear, but no longer could she see the bright star that the strangers had followed from their distant homeland. She began to fret that she would not catch up to the caravan, and if she did, her gift for the new king was not good enough. As these thoughts whirled through her mind, she found that she was suddenly running faster and faster and that she felt no pain in her joints. Soon her speed was so quick her feet left the ground and she flew high into the air. She could look down and see the entire town spread out below her. But no caravan did she see, nor star sign in the sky.

    “What shall I do?” she wept. “I cannot find the caravan of strangers or the new born king.” She continued to fly above the town and noticed that her eyesight had suddenly become as sharp as an eagle’s. What she saw in the town below were many poor children. As she continued to search for the Christ child, she visited the poor children. When she reached into her burlap sack to pull out a branch or twig as a token gift, what she found instead was a toy, cookie or piece of fruit. The more gifts she distributed, the more the sack contained. Soon she had visited every child in Bethlehem except the Christ child. So she went on to the next town continuing her search, then the next, and eventually the whole world.

    She continues her journey each year and visits every child who knows her story. So, if you are a child or a child at heart, remember the Befana and she will visit you and leave you a gift, too.

    The Befana loves children very much and is so sweet that even when the child has been naughty during the year she still leaves them a gift. In these special cases, though, the gift is a piece of coal. For the naughty child, it is a reminder to be better during the coming year. To the Befana it is better than a piece of branch, twig or fire wood.

    Viva, viva la Befana!


    Ralph J. Luciani

     

    “The One” from Apple

    On January 2, 2002, in Uncategorized, by Bob McCormick

    This man’s wish for a MacWorld San Francisco Announcement

    Not long ago Steve Jobs was interviewed and he said that he was in no rush to enter the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) market. He had noticed two things about it. First thing was, like the PC market, it was becoming a commodity market. The second thing he noticed was that hardly anyone was still bringing PDAs to meetings. After reading that I too noticed that nobody was bringing their PDAs to meetings. Most of the folks I know that have one never seem to use them. Graffiti is no match for good old pen and paper, besides a Palm screen seems too small to take real notes to me.

    I’ve never had a PDA so trying to take notes on one hasn’t been an issue for me. I have used my PowerBook in meetings; it worked great for taking notes. The problem was that I wasn’t participating in the meetings. I’m not the worst typist in the world but I’m certainly not the best. Taking notes on a keyboard took just enough time and attention that my participation in the meeting was limited. It wasn’t long before I put the PowerBook away and went back to good ol’ pen and paper. Which allowed me to take notes naturally on the fly, without preventing me from participating in the meeting. But retyping handwritten notes later isn’t very wired.

    What’s a wired guy to do then? I’m wondering if Steve doesn’t have an idea about how to handle this situation. What might Apple’s plan be then? It’s worth looking at what Apple did (or in this case didn’t do) in the past to see how they might address PDAs in the future.

    It wasn’t that long ago that many were speculating that Apple would develop an Internet Appliance. A market that was supposed to be “HOT!” Apple never went down that road. It’s a good thing because companies like Sony and others have stopped selling their Internet appliances. Steve Jobs realized that the Internet is built for a complete computer. Not a stripped down one, with an itty-bitty screen or missing a hard drive. Apple decided it was a dead end road and they were right.

    Notice too that the Apple still hasn’t entered the PDA market. A lot of people have been speculating on that one for years now. Why hasn’t Apple entered that market? The same reason that Apple didn’t enter the Internet Appliance Market. It takes a full computer to do the job of a PDA, right. I think the best way to make PDAs useful is to give everyone the full experience of a computer in a package that can also be used as a PDA. People don’t want half a computer they want it all. People don’t want to try to read spreadsheets or view a proposed company logo on a tiny screen. They need a richer experience than that.

    Just as Internet Appliances never took off because they didn’t offer the full experience of the Internet, PDAs are declining in use because they don’t give you the full capabilities that a real computer can. Graffiti is no substitute for pen and paper or even typewritten text. Additionally, people don’t want to make themselves reminders to e-mail a copy of a Word document to Phil. What want to do is send the file and be done with it. They need the complete networked digital data that only a real computer can give.

    Here’s what I’m hoping Apple announces at MacWorld. Apple has a lot of powerful Handwriting Recognition code from the Newton. I did some reading on the web and found that though it stumbled out of the blocks, it matured into something very useful. Why not combine that with the additional work that Apple has undoubtedly been doing on handwriting recognition and put it all into a complete computer. One that would be as powerful as a TiPowerBook but could also be used as a more functional PDA.

    Yes, this new Mac would be a tablet computer but don’t think of this as just an oversized PDA. This is a complete, full power, fully functioning Macintosh, running OS X. This is the real deal, not a mini-Mac running a scaled down OS X or an OS based on QuickTime. It’s a completely different way to look at a computer or even a PDA.

    Start with a TiPowerBook; strip off the keyboard and track pad, integrate the screen directly where you just stripped the keyboard off and add a place for a stylus pen to snap onto the unit. You’d retain all the ports that the PowerBook came with, USB, FireWire, VGA out, Ethernet etc. You then build a special stand, like the Apple’s LCD displays have but you give this stand the added ability to act as a docking station.

    While it is detached, the computer works with handwriting recognition, the stylus pen also providing mouse functions so you can double click on icons to open applications, navigate through the finder, or use drop down menus. When you snap it into its docking/stand you use a keyboard, mouse and can add other peripherals, just as you would a regular PowerBook or PowerMac.

    Some might call it the iTablet but I’m thinking of calling it something else. I’d call it ‘The One.’ (With apologies to Jet Li.) Why? Because you could do away with your PDA, pads of paper and separate desktop computer they’d all be consolidated into one computer. One that acts as a PDA but is the very same computer you use at your desk.

    While you’re taking notes you’d be using some kind of ‘iTablet’ software to recognize your handwriting. It would automatically translate your handwritten notes into typewritten text. Text you could cut and paste into any program. There could even be a feature where you could ‘handwrite’ directly into Microsoft Word or other programs.

    Now the best part is that since it’s a complete computer you’d have all of your programs available to you at anytime, anywhere right at the tip of your stylus pen. Instead of printing out a hardcopy of the Illustrator file that you are working on and taking that to a meeting, why not just open that on your full-sized color screen and show your coworkers in your weekly progress meeting? No small screen to battle with. No pad and paper to jot down your co-workers suggestions only to have to type them up later. It’s all there!

    The meeting is over now and you’re on your way back to your desk. You run into a coworker that wants to know if your company got the marketing contract for the new client. You open the final proposal file and show your coworker that not only did your company get this marketing contract but that the new client chose his department’s plan. He’s thrilled. With a wink you ask him to keep it quiet until you get back to your desk and can send out the official e-mail.

    Back at your desk you snap The One into it’s docking/stand but instead of transferring your notes from a PDA or laptop all you do is open a new e-mail, paste in your notes, add a few words of congratulations for the winning team, send out the good news and you’re done! Everything is all ready to go on The One.

    I know what you’re thinking. “But Bob, a PDA based on a full sized PowerBook would be too big, too heavy, too bulky, the screen would be too small for use at my desk. It’s never going to work!” First things first, don’t think of this as a PDA, think of it as a complete computer that can also works as your PDA.

    Too big? The TiPowerBook is just one inch thick. Imagine how much thinner a TiBook could be if there was no keyboard or track pad. You save not only the actual physical depth of the keyboard but also the room needed to connect it to the motherboard. Plus you’ll save the extra space to keep the screen off that keyboard.

    Too heavy? The PowerBook is only 5.4 pounds. That’s pretty darned light. I used to keep my PowerBook G3 in a leather portfolio when I’d take it to meetings. Never had a problem carrying that around and it was actually heavier than the current PowerBook. The One would be lighter still.

    Too bulky? Look at the iPod. That’s a five Gig hard drive shoehorned in there. I’m sure that Apple could incorporate some of that technology into the new computer and keep the bulk down. The final size would hardly be bigger than a three ring binder.

    Screen too small? Most companies have standardized on 17-inch CRT screens or in the case of LCDs, 15 inch. A 15.2 inch screen is plenty big enough but for more demanding use The One would also have monitor spanning so it could be attached to an external monitor. And the screen could also switch between Portrait and Landscape automatically for you.

    Considering the above, I’d estimate that The One could be as little as 1.875 inches thick. It would actually weigh in around 5 pounds (give or take an ounce or two). Remember, you won’t have to bring along anything else, no note pads, pencils, PDAs or printouts.

    It’ll never work? The One would work because it would be a complete computer but have the ability to function like a PDA. Because it’s a powerful computer, it will recognize your natural handwriting (not Graffiti or some such compromise) directly on the computer where you need that information. Your full size, full color, full resolution screen would allow you to share information anytime, anywhere with others spontaneously. You’ll never have make yourself a reminder to “Send Phil the parts list” ’cause you’ve already did it via Airport at the meeting. No separate PDA, no reminders, no synching, no paper or pens, it’s all done on The One.

    This could revolutionize business, because companies could replace everyone’s desktop, laptop and even their PDA with a single solitary computer. It’s your PDA, desktop, and laptop. No multiple software licenses, you have all your programs in one place. You use it at work, at your desk and in meetings. You take it home and use in your home office with a second docking/stand and even in your easy chair with Airport, to surf the web.

    One operating system, one copy of applications, one copy of documents, on one computer for everything! No more calls to your company’s IT support because your PDA calendar won’t synch up with your desktop’s copy. No more, “Where did that printout go?” just before the big meeting because you only have The One computer.

    I don’t know if you’re dreaming of a G5 or a flat panel iMac but this is what I’m looking for at MacWorld; the most revolutionary computer since the original Macintosh. One that would transform the business world, reducing IT costs by hundreds of thousands. Not only that, but it would be a godsend to people like myself. Simplifying the multiplicity of a full desktop computer, a PowerBook, a workplace computer, multiple e-mails, multiple projects, multiple meetings and personal interests. Keeping them all up to date and straight is a pain. I’d love one computer that would be just as powerful as my desktop but still small enough to be my PDA. Oh yes, what I wouldn’t give for The One that could do it all.


    Bob McCormick

     

    Looking for something?

    Use the form below to search the site:

    Still not finding what you're looking for? Drop a comment on a post or contact us so we can take care of it!